LNG: TESLARATI

The Tesla Cybertruck continues to attract more and more fans, with the market now warming up to its otherwise polarizing, futuristic design. The vehicle has received orders from a number of high-profile individuals, though a recent reservation may be one of the vehicle’s most impressive yet. In a recent Facebook post, the Norwegian Justice Minister announced that he has personally placed an order for the Cybertruck.

Norwegian Justice Minister Jøran Kallmyr shared a screenshot of his Cybertruck reservation on the social media platform. Kallmyr added some comedic flair to his post as well, tagging his wife, Torunn Smedal Kallmyr, and stating that it’s easier to ask for forgiveness about his purchase than it is to ask for permission. Based on his screenshot, the Justice Minister seemed to have ordered the Cybertruck’s mid-range Dual Motor AWD variant, which has a range of over 300 miles and a 0-60 mph of less than 4.5 seconds. 

In a statement to Nettavisen, Kallmyr admitted that at first glance, he had reservations about the Cybertruck’s design. “At first glance, it was terribly ugly, but gradually it got cooler and cooler,” he said. When he saw the Cybertruck vs Ford F-150 demo video, he was sold. “This is a real boy’s car for a man approaching mid-life crisis. So I just had to have it,” he lightly added. 

The Tesla Cybertruck’s durable construction actually makes it a potentially effective vehicle not just for hauling, but for law enforcement purposes. Its exoskeleton, for one, is fitted with straight panels that are durable and likely easy to fortify for police use. Its large cabin also provides ample space for the necessary equipment that’s standard for vehicles used in law enforcement. Even its flat panels should make it easy for the Cybertruck to be wrapped in police colors.

Kallmyr, for one, stated that the Cybertruck would be a good police vehicle. “The future is probably electric cars… In the future, I think the police will probably drive electric cars,” he said. 

One thing that truly shines with the Cybertruck is its price, which starts at just $39,990. For a price that’s just slightly higher than the Tesla Model 3, buyers could get a large vehicle that’s practically armored and capable of traveling long distances. But beyond this, the Cybertruck also has a very low cost of ownership, thanks to its all-electric design, which requires very little maintenance, as well as its recharging costs, which are only a fraction of the price owners pay to refuel their internal-combustion trucks.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Tesla Cybertruck’s design has been teased by Elon Musk long before it was unveiled, yet the vehicle still dropped jaws when it rolled out on stage during its unveiling event. The Cybertruck has notably polarized the car community, but if a veteran auto expert is any indication, the vehicle may very well be one of Elon Musk’s boldest, greatest creations yet.

In an extensive discussion on his YouTube channel and an accompanying blog post, auto expert Jack Rickard covered several aspects of the Tesla Cybertruck, from its design to the underlying disruption that it would likely trigger in America’s pickup market. Rickard noted that despite its less-than-stellar unveiling, he believes that the Cybertruck may very well be the “most brilliant thing” Elon Musk has ever done, and the “most brilliant design” that Franz von Holfhausen has ever issued.

Rickard argued that with the Cybertruck, Tesla has effectively gone for the pickup market’s jugular by releasing a vehicle that is competitive in cost but exceeding its rivals in terms of toughness and durability, power, spaciousness, and off-road capability. With this particular combination in mind, Rickard noted that he believes the Cybertruck would be “astonishingly successful.”

Pickup trucks, apart from vehicles that are used for work, are also vehicles that invoke toughness. This is evident in the way each of the Big Three in the US promotes their flagship pickups: the F-150, Silverado, and Ram are tough vehicles that can tow and take punishment, but Rickard notes that over the years, these trucks have reached a point where it has become difficult to take them through punishing conditions. “Since some of the larger more tricked out trucks can run $60-$80k, you don’t want to be squeamish about taking it offroad. But the gentle brush of a few branches and that stunning paint job turns to a scratched up mess,” Rickard wrote. 

This is where the Cybertruck excels in. With its stainless steel exoskeleton, Tesla has pretty much hit the ball out of the park. The Cybertruck is unpainted and domineering, and it can literally take a sledgehammer without missing a beat. Its thin lights are even designed in such a way that it would be very difficult to break them. Much of this has to do with its origami-like XY design, which Rickard notes have been floated around for a long time but never attempted by mainstream manufacturers due to its challenges. “I predict that the shock of that design will be replaced by the genius of it,” the auto expert remarked. 

The Cybertruck also excels in power and towing, two key features that are important for real pickup truck buyers. The tug-of-war demo between the Cybertruck and a screaming Ford F-150 spoke volumes: electric motors are more than capable of besting the internal combustion engine. Apart from this, the Cybertruck also has a cavernous interior, which pickup truck buyers would likely love. Six seats, ample legroom at the rear, and arguably the most massive center console in the market are things that the pickup market would not ignore. 

Yet, perhaps the one thing that was largely ignored even in the Cybertruck’s unveiling was its off-road capability, which Rickard states are key to the pickup market. This is because when it comes to pickups, a vehicle must have ample off-road capability, even if it never goes beyond the road in its lifetime. In this regard, Rickard notes that Tesla seems to have knocked the ball out of the park once more. The auto veteran noted that the all-electric pickup reminds him of the Hummer H1, a true rough-and-tough vehicle before its line was toned down with the H2 and H3. 

“This thing’s a Hummer. A Ford F-150, the tricked out 4×4 Supercrew cab, has 9.6” of ground clearance. This has 16” – that’s like a Hummer. I think the Hummer H1 was 16. So it makes a big difference in off-roading And underneath that, I’m told it’s all armored, it’s all covered, you can’t get at the motors, you can’t get at the batteries, it’s a skidplate. So specifically, on the things that define a pickup truck, and I’m surprised Elon Musk even knew what those were, but he’s got it, and that’s this offroad capability, and this kind of tough, durable, manly kind of gig,” Rickard remarked. 

Overall, the Cybertruck may very well remain a polarizing vehicle for years to come, and some may never really grow to like its origami-style XY look. Despite this, Rickard believes that the vehicle hits all the right notes when it comes to price and features that are essential to the pickup buyer. In conclusion, the auto expert noted that some time from now, Tesla Chief Designer Franz von Holfhausen would probably be inducted into the design hall of fame for actually pulling off an XY design. As for CEO Elon Musk, this may be his most brilliant vehicle yet. 

“He hit all the right notes, on here is a truck you can take a sledgehammer to, and you can beat this truck all you want and it doesn’t even show damage. And it has an off-road capability in case you ever roll it up onto the front lawn of your house,” Rickard noted.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla may just have figured out the perfect way to bolster its charging infrastructure during the holidays, a time when more drivers are taking long trips and relying on the company’s Supercharger Network. Based on images and videos captured by the Tesla community, it appears that the electric car maker has started deploying Mobile Supercharger units that are powered by Megapack batteries, which are then installed on a trailer. 

This setup allows Tesla to instantly add more charging stalls at a specific location. One of these Megapack-powered chargers was spotted in San Luis Obispo (SLO) at the Madonna Inn Supercharger. Looking at the photographs of Tesla’s setup from EV enthusiast Brian Swenson, the Megapack appears to be hooked up to eight Urban Supercharger stalls that are set up on the trailer itself.  

Quite interestingly, the Mobile Supercharger stalls are reportedly capable of providing up to 125 kW of dedicated power. This makes them comparable to the previous output of Tesla’s V2 network before it was improved by the electric car maker to allow peak charge rates of up to 150 kW. Regardless, 125 kW is not inconvenient at all, especially for drivers who wish to take a coffee break in the middle of a long drive. 

A video recorded by Tesla owner-enthusiast Shelly Fraval included a brief conversation with one of the electric car maker’s staff who happened to be with the Mobile Supercharger. According to the Tesla employee, the Megapack-powered Mobile Superchargers are being deployed by the company as a way to help owners during holidays such as Thanksgiving. In the Madonna Inn Supercharger, for example, wait times reached almost one hour last year during the holidays, but with the Mobile Supercharger in place, these wait times are expected to decrease to just minutes. 

The deployment of Tesla’s Megapack-powered Mobile Superchargers holds a lot of potential for the company. Such solutions, after all, are perfect for events such as concerts, sports events, and even calamities such as fires and hurricanes. Even if the grid were to go down unexpectedly, Tesla would be able to deploy a mobile charging system to owners across the country. This, of course, would most certainly benefit Tesla owners all over. 

Tesla’s Megapack-powered Mobile Supercharger units will likely be more and more helpful in the coming quarters, particularly as the company starts delivering its most high-volume vehicle to date: the Model Y crossover. Once that vehicle is on the market, there is a very good chance that even Tesla’s expansive Supercharger Network would be utilized to its limits just to meet the demand from Model 3 and Model Y owners. During such instances, the Megapack-powered Mobile Superchargers would definitely be an ace for the company. 

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Elon Musk has hinted on Twitter that the infamous Boring Company “Not-a-Flamethrower” may be included as an option for the newly released Tesla Cybertruck.

The popular post-apocalyptic theme television program The Walking Dead posted a tweet identifying the Cybertruck as a prime candidate for the perfect vehicle to use in the event of a zombie apocalypse. And who could argue? The truck would not dent or break in the event of a zombie takeover. The truck’s durability was displayed during its unveiling event on November 21, where Tesla designer Franz von Holzhausen slammed into the driver’s side door with a sledgehammer. The truck would more than likely get the driver and its 5 other passengers several hundred miles away, especially if the Tri-Motor variant with a 0-60 MPH time of 2.9 seconds and 500+ miles of range is being used.

Musk entertained the idea of the truck being beneficial for evading capture from the rising dead and offered an extra bit of assistance from his past Boring Co. project, the “Not-a-Flamethrower.”

The finest in apocalypse protection technology! Flamethrower optional.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 27, 2019

Musk said on an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience that his Boring Company created the 20,000 Flamethrowers (that sold out in four days) as an “off-the-cuff idea” inspired by the movie Spaceballs. The 1987 film that has been a driving factor behind some of Musk’s high-performance powertrains like Ludicrous Mode and the yet-to-be-released Plaid Mode, was also behind the (Not-a-)Flamethrower. “Yogurt (a character in Spaceballs) goes through the merchandising section, and there’s a Flamethrower…and we said ‘we should do a flamethrower,” Musk said during his interview with Joe Rogan.

While the Not-a-Flamethrower sold out extremely quickly, the name was given to it so international customs agencies could not deny delivery of the modified roofing torch to buyers located outside of the United States. While the Boring Company does not have Flamethrowers available for purchase through its website, it can be found on eBay and they vary in price. We know there is still interest in the Flamethrower, especially from UFC Star Conor McGregor, who recently requested two of them with his Cybertruck pre-order.

While we don’t know if Musk is serious about adding this feature to the Cybertruck, we have learned in the past to never count his ideas out, even if they may seem far fetched and somewhat outlandish. He’s added some extremely unique features for Tesla vehicles, like his hilarious references to “Toilet Humor,” which eventually resulted in the Emissions Testing Mode Easter Egg. After all, the man did invent a Flamethrower to begin with, so who is to say he won’t add it as an optional feature with the all-new Cybertruck.

You can watch Elon Musk talk about his “Not-a-Flamethrower” on the Joe Rogan Experience below.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Recent reports have emerged suggesting that Tesla may be looking to begin producing the Model Y sooner than expected, with suppliers reportedly being notified to manufacture the all-electric crossover’s parts as early as Q4 2019. With this in mind, it appears that Tesla’s updated timetable for the crossover’s release might still be conservative. 

The update from Model Y suppliers was initially related to Asian publication Taiwan Economic Daily. According to the report, Tesla suppliers HOTA and BizLink have been informed by the electric car maker to start the mass production of Model Y parts six months earlier than intended. Considering that Tesla has related in its Q3 2019 Update Letter that the vehicle will likely enter production in Summer 2020, the expedited schedule suggests that mass production for Model Y parts could begin as early as this quarter. 

Quite interestingly, the suppliers were reportedly also notified to expedite the production of parts for the Tesla Semi, though no specific date or timeframe was shared for the long-hauler’s components. 

With these updates in mind, it appears that Tesla may be preparing to start Model Y production activities earlier than its already-updated timetable. When Elon Musk unveiled the crossover back in March, Tesla estimated that the vehicle will start deliveries from Fall 2020, with the base variant starting handovers in Spring 2021. This was a notably conservative timetable for Tesla, which is known for its overly-aggressive targets. 

The Model Y’s production received an update with the release of the electric car maker’s Q3 2019 Update Letter. According to Tesla, its Model Y development is moving faster than scheduled and thus, production of the vehicle could start as early as Summer 2020. It appears that this updated timeframe is the one referenced by Tesla’s suppliers in the recent report from the Taiwanese publication. 

In a way, Tesla does seem to be showing indications that the Model Y will be released sooner than expected. Release candidates of the upcoming all-electric crossover are being spotted in increasing frequencies across the United States, both in Tesla’s home state of CA all the way to states in the East Coast. Varying trims of the vehicle seem to be undergoing real-world testing as well. Apart from these, reports have emerged earlier this year suggesting that the Fremont factory is already being tooled for Model Y production. 

With these in mind, there seems to be a pretty decent chance that Tesla may surprise the market by delivering what could very well be its most disruptive vehicle ahead of schedule. If Tesla were to pull this off, it could provide the company with added momentum, as it would demonstrate that its production targets are now more realistic and feasible. It could also help prove that Tesla and Elon Musk may have learned how to underpromise and overdeliver.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Tesla Cybertruck is not a vehicle that could be appreciated by everyone. Uncompromisingly futuristic and angular to a fault, the vehicle looks less like a traditional pickup compared to other all-electric trucks like the Rivian R1T. Thanks to its polarizing looks, Tesla critics have predicted that the Cybertruck would be a flop, since the vehicle would not appeal to traditional “truck people,” who have preconceived notions about what a pickup should look like. 

To be fair, the Cybertruck has received harsh criticism from a good number of classic pickup truck enthusiasts. Yet, despite this, the idea that the all-electric truck would fail because it would not appeal to a “typical Ford F-150 buyer” will likely be proven wrong. In fact, if one were to look at the history of Tesla’s vehicles, particularly the Model 3, one would note that the electric car maker’s cars do not really need the support of an existing demographic to be a success. 

Tesla made a rather strange decision when it decided to start the Model 3’s rollout on the United States. During that time, some of the company’s critics pointed to the alleged folly of this strategy, particularly as the US’ luxury sedan market was in a steep decline. Yet, when Tesla hit its stride with Model 3 production, this bearish thesis was proven wrong. American car buyers bought the electric sedan, ending 2018 as the best-selling luxury car on the market with over 145,000 units sold. 

Tesla’s later discussions on Model 3 trends featured interesting insights about the vehicle and why it continued to buck the trend by thriving despite the decline in the US’ sedan sales. As it turned out, the Model 3 did not just convert existing luxury car buyers when it was released — it actually inspired a new type of electric car buyer. What are these customers? They were people who have never considered buying a premium vehicle before. 

This is why some of the top vehicles traded in for the Model 3 include more affordable vehicles like the Toyota Prius and the Honda Accord. By offering the best tech and safety at a price point that’s justified by a significantly lower total cost of ownership, Tesla ended up encouraging customers to acquire the Model 3, even if they have to make a stretch to do so. By doing this, the Model 3 was essentially able to create a market for itself. The same could happen to the Cybertruck. 

Thus, while it is true that the Cybertruck may never convert die-hard “truck people” who are loyal to veteran brands, the vehicle may also easily attract buyers who were previously not in the market for a pickup truck at all. This is already hinted at by some reservation holders who have shared their insights online, with some admitting that they are not “truck people” at all, but they are attracted to the Cybertruck’s cost and features nonetheless. Starting at $39,990, the Cybertruck is only a bit more expensive than the Standard Range Plus Model 3, which is a sedan. 

The Tesla Cybertruck is still more expensive than entry-level pickups on the market, but it is priced very competitively against full-sized, double-cab pickups from rival carmakers. The vehicle is also loaded to the teeth with standard features that would otherwise require an aftermarket modification, such as its motorized tonneau cover. Couple this with a lower cost of ownership compared to massive fuel and maintenance costs incurred by conventional gas-guzzlers like the Ford F-150 and the Cybertruck becomes a very attractive vehicle, pickup veterans and otherwise. 

H/T u/Dandan0005/Reddit

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

SpaceX has successfully fired up a new rocket ahead of what is now believed to be a surprise Falcon 9 booster drone ship landing, to follow shortly after the company’s upcoming CRS-19 Cargo Dragon resupply mission for NASA.

Around 5:30 pm EST (22:30 UTC) on November 26th, a Falcon 9 rocket – featuring a rare unflown booster – successfully performed a wet dress rehearsal (WDR) and ignited all nine of its first age Merlin 1D engines, verifying the rocket’s health and perfectly simulating a launch right up to the point of liftoff. With that routine static fire complete, SpaceX now has a luxurious seven days to bring the rocket horizontal, roll it back into LC-40’s integration and processing hangar, install Cargo Dragon atop the second stage, and roll the fully-integrated rocket back out to the launch mount.

According to NASASpaceflight.com reporter Michael Baylor, SpaceX decided to swap boosters, moving Falcon 9 B1056.3 to a commercial satellite mission and assigning B1059.1 to Cargo Dragon’s NASA CRS-19 resupply mission. Prior to visual confirmation of this shift, NASA and SpaceX had indicated interest in flying Block 5 booster B1056 for a third time after it successfully completed its second launch and landing for NASA on July 25th, 2019. That would have been the first time NASA certified a twice-flown SpaceX booster to launch a NASA mission, a critical step along the path to making booster reuse routine – even for SpaceX’s highest-profile customers.

Instead, B1056.3 is now scheduled to launch the Kacific-1/JCSAT-18 commsat no earlier than December 15th, while CRS-19 is scheduled to lift off at 12:51 pm EST (17:51 UTC) on December 4th. As with most other missions designed to quickly rendezvous with the International Space Station (ISS), CRS-19’s launch window is effectively instantaneous, meaning that any issue during the countdown or day-of preparations will force a ~24-hour recycle.

Aside from it being unclear why exactly NASA, SpaceX, or both parties decided against launching B1056 for the third time on CRS-19, the mission features another minor mystery. Instead of using the performance left over from such a light launch to low Earth orbit (LEO) to return the booster to launch site (RTLS) and land at SpaceX’s LZ-1/2 landing pads, it appears that Falcon 9 B1059 will attempt to land aboard drone ship Of Course I Still Love You (OCISLY).

Since April 2016, SpaceX has only once intentionally recovered Falcon 9 by sea after a Cargo Dragon launch. That particularly recovery occurred during CRS-17 in May 2019, just a few weeks after Crew Dragon capsule DM-1 catastrophically exploded just prior to an attempted static fire test located adjacent to LZ-1/2. That explosion littered the area with evidence, precluding Falcon 9’s planned LZ-1 recovery in the same way that a police helicopter would likely try to avoid landing directly on top of an active crime scene. In that case, extraordinary attenuating circumstances were required before SpaceX redirected a CRS launch’s booster recovery to a drone ship.

Seemingly lacking similarly extraordinary circumstances, it remains to be seen whether SpaceX or NASA will offer an explanation for the unexpected change in plans. On the plus side, an unexpected Falcon 9 drone ship landing also means an unexpected Port Canaveral return, which should offer increasingly rare views of a once-flown Falcon 9 booster.

Routinely reusable spacecraft

As expected, CRS-19 will become the second orbital launch of a twice-flown Cargo Dragon capsule, flexing SpaceX’s reusability muscles in the much less forgiving realm of orbital spacecraft. On July 25th, CRS-18 became the first such mission to reuse a twice-flown spacecraft, leaving SpaceX with several additional twice-flown Cargo Dragon capsules as the only plausible options for its remaining three CRS1 missions.

SpaceX says that CRS-19’s Cargo Dragon capsule previously flew CRS-4 (Sept 2014) and CRS-11 (June 2017), identifying it as capsule C106. As it turns out, C106 supported SpaceX’s first Cargo Dragon capsule reuse, making it a fairly historic vehicle – the first commercial orbital spacecraft reused in history. Beginning with CRS-3, Dragon 1 vehicles were designed to support up to three orbital missions each, leaving SpaceX with four possible capsules (C110-C113) capable of supporting CRS-20, Dragon 1’s last planned launch.

Check out Teslarati’s newsletters for prompt updates, on-the-ground perspectives, and unique glimpses of SpaceX’s rocket launch and recovery processes.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The market may be warming up to the Tesla Cybertruck has shown in the vehicle’s 200k reservations and its spreading support among social media influencers and athletes, but some rival carmakers do not seem to be as friendly to the polarizing vehicle. Among these are BMW and Fisker, both of which have seemingly thrown some shade on the Tesla Cybertruck, particularly with its durability and its angular design. 

Following the Cybertruck’s unveiling, which was marred by an otherwise unfortunate incident surrounding the vehicle’s Armor Glass demo, German automaker BMW took to Twitter to promote its BMW X5 Protection VR6, an armored version of its popular SUV that is as tough as it gets. Referencing Tesla’s demo, BMW noted that its X5 Protection VR6 offers splinter protection “in case it gets hit by a metal ball,” an apparent reference to the Cybertruck’s unveiling event. 

BMW’s comment is a bit interesting considering the price disparity between the X5 Protection VR6 and the Cybertruck. Starting at $39,990, the Cybertruck is priced far below BMW’s SUV, which has a base MSRP of $58,900 before options. And that’s just the regular X5 as well. Special variants such as the BMW X5 Protection VR6, which are designed to fully protect passengers, are far more expensive. 

Yet it wasn’t just BMW which was all-too-willing to throw shade at Telsa for its Cybertruck. The all-electric pickup is unforgivingly angular and brutalist, and it looks almost like the antithesis of Tesla’s previous cars like the sleek Model S or the futuristic Model X. The Cybertruck’s angular frame then became an easy target for Fisker Inc. Chairman and noted automotive designer Henrik Fisker, who took to Twitter to seemingly poke fun at Elon Musk’s pickup truck, particularly its exoskeleton, by posting an image of a moving box with four wheels. 

Fisker’s rather boxy comments following the Cybertruck’s reveal are quite interesting, considering that Henrik Fisker was actually once connected to Tesla. Prior to the founding of Fisker Automotive, Musk had shown the noted auto designer Tesla’s idea for the WhiteStar sedan (a vehicle that would become the Model S), but the designs Fisker ended up submitting to the electric car maker were all substandard. When confronted by Tesla, Fisker would reportedly blame the physical constraints that Musk and the company had placed on the car. Fisker would later establish Fisker Automotive with the Karma, a well-designed sedan, at the forefront. 

Fortunately for Tesla then, Musk was able to hire then-Mazda designer Franz von Holzhausen to take over the WhiteStar sedan’s design that Fisker could not accomplish. The result of this was the original Model S, which has largely remained unchanged in the seven years it has been on the market. The Model S was a resounding success, earning MotorTrend‘s Ultimate Car of the Year award earlier this year. Overall, it is quite ironic to see Henrik Fisker poke fun at Tesla for its Cybertruck design, seeing as he was unable to design a sedan for the company back when it was still starting out.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});