LNG: TESLARATI

Tesla’s Gigafactory Shanghai has reportedly hit a new milestone, with local reports pointing to the facility producing 3,000 Model 3 per week. The update comes amidst China’s ongoing push to jumpstart its auto industry, with the country even reopening a car factory in Wuhan, the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak. 

A recent flyover by Tesla enthusiast and drone operator Wuwa Vision revealed that Giga Shanghai is budding with activity. Since its brief shutdown earlier this year during the height of the coronavirus outbreak in China, the electric car production facility has steadily resumed its operations. Today, the site seems to be as busy as ever, with Phase 1 humming along and Phase 2 under active construction. 

Images from the recent flyover show that Tesla is making great progress with Phase 2, which seems to cover a large swath of land. A number of Made-in-China Model 3 were also being driven to a large parking lot beside the Phase 1 area, seemingly awaiting delivery. Large numbers of container vans are also on the site, supplying the facility with the necessary parts to produce the all-electric sedan. 

With local reports pointing to Gigafactory Shanghai hitting a production rate of 3,000 Model 3 per week, Tesla seems to be well on its way towards reaching its goal for its China facility. Tesla has shared aggressive plans for Giga Shanghai, with the electric car maker looking to hit an annual production rate of 150,000 vehicles per year. Considering that Tesla China has already reached the 3,000-per-week milestone, the electric car maker may very well end the year with a run-rate far above its initial target. 

While the C-19 pandemic continues to take its hold in several countries, including the United States, China appears to be on its way towards recovery. The coronavirus outbreak hit the Asian country’s auto industry hard, but China has started initiatives to jumpstart and boost its local car market. As noted in an Automotive News Europe report, for example, the PSA Group’s joint venture with the Dongfeng Motor Group has announced that car production has resumed at its plant in Wuhan, the actual epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak. 

Amidst China’s efforts at boosting its auto industry, car sales in the country are expected to see a rise in the coming months. This rebound will likely be appreciated by carmakers, including Tesla, considering that numbers hit bottom in February, a time when the entire country was vastly affected by the C-19 pandemic. 

Watch a recent drone flyover of the Tesla Giga Shanghai site in the video below.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Tesla Model Y is proving to be a vehicle that is full of tricks, especially when it comes to winter driving. If recent reports from the Tesla community are any indication, the all-electric crossover is equipped with a radar heater, which should help the vehicle navigate icy roads without disengaging driver-assist features like Autopilot.

References to the Model Y’s radar heater were shared with the Tesla community by resident hacker-enthusiast @greentheonly, who discovered the new feature in the crossover’s wiring diagrams. The supplier of the radar and the model number of the actual part used in the Model Y remains unknown, but the presence of the heating unit does bode well for the vehicle’s Autopilot performance in icy conditions.

Tesla’s electric cars like the Model S, Model X, and Model 3 are great winter cars, thanks to their all-electric construction and design. That said, Tesla’s vehicles do have areas of improvement, especially when it comes to their cameras and radar, as both parts could be compromised when they get caked by a layer of ice or snow. 

This is something that is experienced by Tesla community members such as Model 3 owner Chris from the Dirty Tesla YouTube channel, who lives in an area that experiences harsh winters. As could be seen in several of the YouTube host’s Autopilot tests, Tesla’s advanced driver-assist features, or even basic cruise control, can get disabled once the cameras or radar are covered in ice. 

Such instances would be far less likely with the Model Y’s radar heater in place. In a way, its addition is something that seems to have been planned by the electric car maker, as Elon Musk referenced radar heaters back in late 2018. Musk noted that while Teslas will primarily operate on a vision-only system, a radar heater would be a good idea anyway. As it turned out, Tesla was only looking to equip the new component in its next vehicle. The company has just been very discreet about it. 

It is pertinent for Tesla to ensure that Autopilot and more advanced Full Self-Driving features such as Navigate on Autopilot with automatic lane changes could function in any type of weather. Tesla, after all, intends to roll out a dedicated Robotaxi network that utilizes self-driving vehicles with need no human drivers. For the service to be fully operational, the company must be able to ensure that its cars can drive even in the iciest of conditions. 

The Tesla Model Y is looking to be Tesla’s best vehicle for winter driving to date. Apart from its radar heater, the Model Y is also equipped with a new heat pump system, which is expected to reduce range reductions during winters. 

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

SpaceX has begun to upgrade its South Texas Starship launch pad in anticipation of the completion of the next full-scale rocket prototype, photos of which CEO Elon Musk revealed just hours ago.

Working in parallel with efforts to repair damage caused by Starship serial number 1’s (SN1) violent February 28th test failure, SpaceX has managed to build, complete, and test an entirely separate ‘test tank’ and complete fabrication of a second full-scale Starship in a handful of weeks. Flexing the growing capabilities of the impressive Boca Chica, Texas Starship factory SpaceX has sprung up in just three months, the company is working around the clock to build not just one – but several – Starship prototypes simultaneously.

A successful March 9th tank test designed to prove a new thrust structure design managed to do just that less than two weeks after the same faulty part brought about Starship SN1’s demise. In the two weeks since that its test completion, SpaceX has been busy welding, stacking, welding, and stacking several separate sections of the next Starship prototype, known as SN3. Potentially a matter of days away from structural completion, focus has recently shifted to the launch pad the ship will be tested at. In the last few days, SpaceX technicians have begun to install a bizarre, new structural element on the mount Starship SN3 will be secured on top of, hinting at the goals of the rocket’s first test campaign.

Squeezing in alongside efforts to repair the propellant lines that run into the launch mount, upgrades began on March 24th as a SpaceX team worked to install what looked like an incredibly sturdy tripod (with four ‘legs’, of course). Thanks to familiar testing done with SpaceX’s most recent Starship tank prototype, the purpose of the launch mount’s newest appendage quickly became clear.

During the Starship SN2 tank’s thrust structure (‘thrust puck’, per Elon Musk) test campaign, SpaceX debuted the concurrent use of a beefy hydraulic jack to simulate the forces a Raptor engine static might produce. Capable of producing upwards of 200 metric tons (440,000 lbf) of thrust at full power, SpaceX will likely begin Starship static fire tests with a single Raptor engine. As soon as a Starship prototype completes one or several single-engine test fires, the plan is to install three sea level-optimized Raptor engines and repeat static fire tests.

Before that triple-engine static fire milestone, a first for the cutting-edge Raptor engine, SpaceX needs to verify that Starship’s thrust structure can stand up to the ~600 tons (~1.3M lbf) of force it will be subjected to during such a test. Sitting on a much smaller stand, Starship SN2 used a single hydraulic jack and temporary stand to simulate a single engine’s thrust. Starship SN3, sitting much higher above the ground, will need three jacks to simulate three Raptors.

As such, it looks likely that Starship SN3’s first cryogenic tank proof test – filling the vehicle with inert liquid nitrogen – will coincide with a second dedicated stress test of a Starship thrust structure, hopefully proving itself capable of surviving the force of three Raptor engines at full thrust. While orbital-class Starships will need three more vacuum-optimized Raptor engines, three sea-level engines are all SpaceX needs to begin flight tests with suborbital prototypes.

Based on an unofficial analysis of existing photos, it appears that every single major structural piece of Starship SN3 – excluding legs and fins – is nearing completion, even including the ship’s shiny nosecone. Likely to head to the launch pad for its first tests as soon as the tank section alone has been completed, just one stacking event remains before said tank section reaches its full height. Right now, both of those parts have been moved to a dedicated Vehicle/Vertical Assembly Building (VAB) and are probably no more than a day or two away from being joined*. Perhaps just a day or two after that milestone, SpaceX will likely transport the massive rocket to the launch pad to begin preparing for its first proof tests.

*Around 3am local time, SpaceX technicians stacked Starship SN3’s two main segments, completing its tank and engine section.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

During times of crisis, some members of the auto industry adapt to help out. Such is the case with GM, Ford, and Tesla, all of which have received approval from the US President to help out the country’s medical infrastructure by producing ventilators and other key medical equipment. Other car companies, on the other hand, are opting for a slightly different approach to the crisis. 

Unfortunately, some of these approaches do not seem to sit particularly well with the auto community as a whole. A perfect example of this is a recent ad from BMW i, the German automaker’s EV division. The ad featured the division’s i8 hybrid sports car, a vehicle expected to be put to pasture this coming April. 

The ad was simple enough, but it included references to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. The team behind the BMW i8 ad even opted to include the #FlattenTheCurve hashtag, which is currently partly being used to inform and address the online community about the C-19 outbreak. “Be a roadblock of the outbreak and make your own contribution to #FlattenTheCurve. The BMW i8 Coupe Ultimate Sophisto Edition,” the ad read. 

Needless to say, BMW’s advertisement prompted a strong response from the online community, including veteran car authorities such as The Drive’s Alex Roy, who urged the German automaker to terminate the ad agency behind the post. In a way, such reactions are understandable, considering the current state of the coronavirus outbreak and how it has disrupted the lives of millions across the globe. 

It did not take long before BMW i issued an apology, admitting that its recent ad caused the online car community to be “irritated.” The German automaker followed this up by a pledge to do better. “We are sorry. Our last Tweet caused some irritation, and you were right in your criticism. Our main intention these days is to share optimistic and helpful content to brighten up your days. We are all in this together. We can do better, and we will,” the automaker noted. 

Despite the blunder from the BMW i marketing team, the German automaker has actually adopted some proactive measures for its European facilities. In an announcement last week, for example, BMW, together with Japanese carmakers Honda and Toyota, stated that it would be suspending its car production in the UK. BMW noted that the suspension of production would be in effect until April 17, at least for the meantime. 

Marketing gaffes aside, some key players in the auto industry are showing remarkable initiative to help out amidst the coronavirus outbreak. In a recent announcement, for example, Ford revealed that it is partnering with GE and 3M to build ventilators, respirators, and face shields at some of its facilities. Tesla, on the other hand, has been hard at work, donating N95 masks and ventilators to cities that require medical supplies. 

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Model Y is pretty unique in the way that it is the only Tesla today with a dedicated “Off-Road Assist” mode. This feature, despite being more of a side function for the Model Y, bodes very well for the Cybertruck’s off-road and overlanding capabilities. 

The Tesla Model Y’s design gives the impression that the vehicle is designed for the city, and this is no more emphasized in the Performance variant, which sits low on the ground with large 21″ Überturbine Wheels. The Model Y Performance is built for quickness and handling, but if a recent video is any indication, even such a vehicle can hint at some of Tesla’s off-road tech that is currently in development. 

The Out of Spec Motoring group recently managed to get their hands on a brand new Model Y Performance, thanks to owner-enthusiast Brian of the i1Tesla YouTube channel. The motoring group tested the Model Y’s track capabilities, and they came away impressed at the vehicle’s driving dynamics. But in a recent tweet, the group also demonstrated how Tesla’s Off-Road Assist feature worked on the Model Y. 

The test was brief, and the location of the run was only the uneven, grassy outskirts of the North Carolina Center for Automotive Research track. But even in the quick test, it was evident that the Model Y’s “off-road” assist feature performed quite a bit better than the AWD systems used by Tesla in its previous vehicles, like the Model X and the Dual Motor Model 3. 

The group, for one, opted to check how the Model Y handles a situation where some of its tires are off the ground, compromising its traction. Based on the short clip, the all-electric crossover did not seem to have any problems sending power to the correct wheels. This allowed the Model Y to navigate the uneven terrain without any difficulty. 

While critics would be quick to point out that Out of Spec Motoring‘s Model Y off-road test only provided a slight strain on the all-electric crossover’s systems, it should be noted that the vehicle will likely provide Tesla with valuable data that could then be used for the company’s upcoming vehicles like the Cybertruck. 

Unlike the Model Y, the Cybertruck is designed as a true rough-and-tough vehicle, and it would require a dedicated off-road assist feature that’s enough to match or perhaps even shame industry leaders such as Jeep and land Rover. This is especially true if Tesla were to target the overlanding market, a community of buyers that prioritize vehicles that can handle the elements for extended periods of time. 

The Model Y’s Off-Road Assist feature will likely be used for the most part to traverse terrain much like the one used by Out of Spec Motoring in its brief test. Yet the feature could very well turn out to be the next Track Mode, a capability that will likely allow the company’s flagship vehicles to dominate on the closed circuit when they get released. While the Model 3’s Track Mode would likely enable the next-gen Roadster to outclass other supercars, the Model Y’s off-road assist would likely pave the way for the Cybertruck’s disruption of the pickup truck market. 

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Officials from New York State are calling on Elon Musk and Tesla to reopen Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo for the production of ventilators and other critical medical equipment. The officials’ updates come amidst Tesla’s recent suspension of its Giga New York plant, as a means to protect employees from the ongoing spread of the coronavirus.

In a statement to ABC7 News, New York State Assemblyman Sean Ryan noted that everyone must do their part in helping the country address the C-19 pandemic. While Ryan lauded Elon Musk and the Tesla team for their efforts, the Assemblyman emphasized that the electric car maker’s Buffalo facility could be utilized to address the state’s current challenges with the virus. 

Update: Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirms Giga New York will reopen for ventilator production as soon possible

Giga New York will reopen for ventilator production as soon as humanly possible. We will do anything in our power to help the citizens of New York.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 25, 2020

“There is no doubt that COVID-19 has created an unprecedented challenge for New York, for our nation, and for the entire world. At this difficult time, it is critical that each of us do our part to ensure our state can respond to the growing pandemic. I thank Elon Musk and the team at Tesla for announcing that they are working on a plan. Tesla’s factory in Buffalo would be an ideal location to ramp up ventilator production, and I urge them to make this commitment immediately,” he said. 

Ryan also outlined his points in a letter to the Tesla and SpaceX CEO. The letter is as follows. 

March 24, 2020

Dear Mr. Musk, 

I write today regarding the growing COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing efforts to fight the virus and save lives. I want to thank you and your company for announcing a plan to make ventilators to help meet the need for the essential part of the response to help save lives during the pandemic. As your plans move forward, I urge you to ramp up ventilator production at the Tesla factory located in Buffalo, New York.

With COVID-19 impacting every segment of our society and economy, Tesla’s solar production factory in Buffalo has currently suspended operations. At this difficult time, it is critical that each of us do our part to ensure our state can respond to the growing pandemic. New York State is the most impacted state in the nation with over 20,000 cases COVID-19, and the numbers are growing every day. It makes sense that increased ventilator production would happen here to ensure we can meet the growing demand of our healthcare system. 

Sincerely, 

Sean M. Ryan

Member of Assembly

It’s not just Assemblyman Ryan that has called on Tesla and Elon Musk to reopen Giga New York for the production of ventilators and other medical supplies that are pertinent in the fight against C-19. In a recent tweet, NYGOP Chairman Nick Langworthy advised Elon Musk that “emergency times call for emergency measures,” one of which is the repurposing Tesla’s Solarglass Roof and Supercharger facility for ventilator and medical supply production. 

“Perhaps the @Tesla plant in Buffalo owned by New York State and gifted to @elonmusk should be repurposed to manufacture ventilators and critical medical equipment as soon as humanly possible. Emergency times call for drastic measures,” Langworthy wrote. 

Perhaps the @Tesla plant in Buffalo owned by New York State and gifted to @elonmusk should be repurposed to manufacture ventilators and critical medical equipment as soon as humanly possible. Emergency times call fro drastic measures.

— Nick Langworthy (@NickLangworthy) March 19, 2020

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

An in-flight rocket engine failure during SpaceX’s March 18th Starlink launch could pose a threat to the company’s imminent NASA astronaut launch debut according to a statement provided by the space agency yesterday.

SpaceX and NASA are currently working around the clock to prepare a Falcon 9 rocket and Crew Dragon spacecraft for the company’s inaugural astronaut launch, a flight known as Demonstration Mission 2 (Demo-2/DM-2). All launch vehicle and spacecraft hardware – including booster B1058, an expendable upper stage, a spacecraft trunk, and the Crew Dragon capsule itself – are already believed to be at SpaceX’s Florida launch and processing facilities.

Prior to March 18th, the biggest gating items were believed to be a few final parachute tests and a whole lot of paperwork and reviews, as well as some important but less showstopping astronaut training. Unfortunately, SpaceX has suffered two unforeseen issues of varying severity in the last few days, both of which are now all but guaranteed to impact Crew Dragon’s astronaut launch debut schedule.

“According to the CCtCap contracts, SpaceX is required to make available to NASA all data and resulting reports. SpaceX, with NASA’s concurrence, would need to implement any corrective actions found during the investigation related to its commercial crew work prior to its flight test with astronauts to the International Space Station. NASA and SpaceX are holding the current mid-to-late May launch timeframe, and would adjust the date based on review of the data, if appropriate.”

NASA — March 25th, 2020

On March 18th, less than three minutes after liftoff and shortly before stage separation was scheduled, Falcon 9 booster B1048 – on its historic fifth launch attempt – suffered an engine failure visible on SpaceX’s official webcast. By all appearances, Falcon 9’s autonomous flight computer accounted for the engine’s failure, shutdown, and the resultant loss of thrust by burning B1048’s eight remaining engines for several seconds longer than planned.

While that extra few seconds of burn time likely ensured that the rocket’s upper stage was able to make it to the correct orbit after stage separation, roughly five minutes after B1048’s extremely rapid engine failure, contact was lost. For the first time ever, there were no landing burn-related call-outs from SpaceX launch operators, the first sign that something was seriously wrong. A few minutes later, SpaceX’s webcast hosts acknowledged that the booster had been lost, perhaps lacking the propellant it needed to attempt a landing.

For reference, Merlin 1D engines likely consume some ~270 kg (600 lb) of fuel each second. Falcon 9’s landing propellant reserves are believed to be on the order of 50+ metric tons (110,000 lb). Excluding the failed engine, eight Merlin 1Ds burning at full thrust for an additional 5 seconds would consume 20% of the propellant needed for landing; 10 seconds and it would use 40%.

The anomaly was Merlin 1D engine’s first in-flight failure ever. The 2012 failure of one of an original Falcon 9 V1.0’s rocket’s nine Merlin 1C engines is SpaceX’s only other in-flight failure.

It’s likely that B1048’s engine failure was primarily related to the fact that the booster was SpaceX’s pathfinder for a fifth-flight reusability milestone, making it the most reused rocket booster ever launched. NASA currently requires all of its Crew Dragon missions to launch on new Falcon 9 rockets, hopefully mitigating direct corollaries between the Starlink L6 anomaly and astronaut launches. Regardless, the space agency says that the company will now have to complete its internal failure review and implement necessary hardware, software, or rule changes before it’s allowed to launch NASA astronauts.

That investigation could take a matter of weeks, possibly even less, but it’s entirely possible that it could take months – let alone fixing the problems that allowed the in-flight Merlin 1D engine failure to happen in the first place. Ultimately, it will almost certainly make even the first flights of Falcon 9 and Heavy rocket boosters safer, but it could substantially delay SpaceX’s Demo-2 astronaut launch debut. Still targeted no earlier than (NET) mid-to-late May 2020, it’s safe to say that it’s reasonable to expect that schedule to slip over the next 4-6 weeks. Stay tuned for updates.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

SpaceX says it encountered an issue that forced it to drop a Crew Dragon spacecraft mockup during parachute testing — not a failure of the vehicle or its parachutes, to be clear, but still a problem nonetheless.

This is now the second significant hurdle SpaceX’s Crew Dragon astronaut spacecraft has faced in the last few days, following the revelation that NASA will not permit the company to launch astronauts until it completes an investigation into an in-flight rocket engine failure during its March 18th Starlink launch. There is likely no technical corollary for the new Falcon 9 rockets that will launch NASA astronauts, but existing Commercial Crew Program (CCP) contract rules still require SpaceX’s internal investigation be completed before it can proceed. With lives on the line, caution – within reason – is unequivocally preferable to the alternative.

Thankfully, SpaceX’s parachute test article anomaly should have a much smaller impact on Crew Dragon’s astronaut launch debut schedule, but it’s unlikely to have zero impact.

“During a planned parachute drop test [on Tuesday], the test article suspended underneath the helicopter became unstable. Out of an abundance of caution and to keep the helicopter crew safe, the pilot pulled the emergency release. As the helicopter was not yet at target conditions, the test article was not armed, and as such, the parachute system did not initiate the parachute deployment sequence. While the test article was lost, this was not a failure of the parachute system and most importantly no one was injured. NASA and SpaceX are working together to determine the testing plan going forward in advance of Crew Dragon’s second demonstration mission.”

SpaceX — March 24th, 2020

On March 24th, SpaceX says it was preparing for one of the last system-level Crew Dragon parachute tests planned before the spacecraft can be declared ready for human spaceflight. These final tests are reportedly focused on corner cases, referring to unusual but not impossible scenarios the spacecraft might encounter during operational astronaut landing attempts. Those likely include parachute deployment scenarios that are far more stressful than a nominal reentry, descent, and landing would allow.

Regardless, things did not go as planned during Tuesday’s test attempt. SpaceX primarily uses cargo planes, helicopters, and large balloons to carry its Crew Dragon test articles (not actual functional spacecraft) to the altitudes and speeds needed to achieve certain test conditions. On March 24th, SpaceX was using a helicopter – either a civilian Blackhawk or a much larger Skycrane.

For unknown reasons, the helicopter carrying the Crew Dragon test article on March 24th began to experience “instability”, likely referring to some sort of resonance (wobble, sway, oscillation, etc). Out of an abundance of caution, the pilot – likely highly trained – decided the instability was becoming an unacceptable risk and chose to drop the cargo load (a Crew Dragon mockup). Unsurprisingly, the parachute test article was not ready to drop and plummeted to the Earth without any kind of parachute deployment, likely pancaking on the desert floor shortly thereafter.

Again, it needs to be noted – as SpaceX did above – that the loss of the Crew Dragon parachute test article was entirely unrelated to the performance of the spacecraft or the parachutes it was testing. The mockup destroyed in the incident is essentially just a boilerplate mass simulator shaped like a Crew Dragon capsule to achieve more aerodynamically accurate test results. As such, it’s far simpler and cheaper than an actual Dragon spacecraft and shouldn’t take long at all to replace if SpaceX doesn’t already have a second similar mockup ready to go.

Thankfully, that means that the loss of the test article should have next to no serious impact on Crew Dragon’s inaugural astronaut launch schedule. Planned no earlier than (NET) mid-to-late May according to NASA’s latest official statement, SpaceX and the space agency still have at least a month and a half to work through a final parachute test campaign, complete an investigation into Starlink L6’s Falcon booster engine failure, and finish several trees worth of paperwork and reviews. Delays remain likely but they shouldn’t be more than a few weeks, barring any future surprises.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});