Electric Vehicle lifecycle study once again proves lower emissions, debunking “clean petrol” myth


Critics of the electric car movement have long used the argument that an EV’s manufacturing process cancels out its positive environmental impact. However, a new study from multiple European universities titled “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time,” shows that electric vehicles are more emissions-friendly than their petrol-based counterparts. 

“We show that already under current carbon intensities of electricity generation, electric cars and heat pumps are less emission-intensive than fossil-fuel-based alternatives in 53 world regions, representing 95% of the global transport and heating demand,” the report’s abstract states.

Researchers at Cambridge, Exeter, and Dutch college Nijmegen University performed the study, which concluded that the myths surrounding electric vehicles and their possibly unfavorable impact on the environment only occurs in 1/20th of the world. Poland is the most notable country where this happens is, the BBC initially reported.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Researchers based their conclusions on the fact that “lifetime” emissions, meaning the amount of pollution a vehicle contributes toward the environment over the entire duration that the car is operable,w are up to 70% lower than petrol vehicles in countries where electricity comes from renewables and nuclear. France and Sweden are just two countries that fit this description.

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom offers around 30% less pollution for electric cars.

The lead author for the study, Dr. Florian Knobloch, states, “The idea that electric vehicles could increase emissions is a complete myth.”

The study indicates that as countries begin to maneuver toward more sustainable forms of energy, these figures will rise. With many countries around the world implementing petrol-bans that will take effect between 2030 and 2040, these numbers will grow as solar, wind, and other forms of clean energy are being used on a more broad scale.

Researchers also predicted in their report that at least 50% of the world’s vehicles could be electric by 2050. If this were the case, 1.5 gigatonnes of CO2 could be eliminated from the Earth’s atmosphere, a figure that is currently equivalent to the current emissions rate of Russia.

“We’ve seen a lot of discussion about this [topic] recently, with lots of disinformation going around,” Knobloch added.

Critics of the EV movement often point to battery production as being the most polluting part of a battery electric vehicle’s lifespan. This myth was dispelled in December 2019, when the IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, one of the firms responsible for the original anti-EV claim, completed a new study that showed a significant decline in CO2 emissions during lithium-ion battery production.

The explanation for this decrease in emissions is due to larger-scale battery production as EVs become more popular, and their power source is in higher demand.

The only remaining issue is getting countries all around the world to adapt to the electric vehicle movement. While the UK has implemented a 2050 climate goal of bringing greenhouse gases to net-zero, it ultimately falls on a consumer’s need for a new car, and whether they will choose to buy electric. With price parity with gas vehicles expected to be reached by 2023, cost will no longer be an issue.

 

Electric Vehicle lifecycle study once again proves lower emissions, debunking “clean petrol” myth

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Electric Vehicle lifecycle study once again proves lower emissions, debunking «clean petrol» myth»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/electric-vehicle-lifecycle-lower-emissions-combustion-cars/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134439»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla Model Y power reading shows Model 3 Performance can get even quicker


Tesla Model Y Performance is higher than that of the Model 3 Performance, according to measurements of power output from the vehicle’s dual electric motors.

Brooks Weisblat of the DragTimes YouTube channel measured each vehicle’s power output through a Bluetooth-enabled OBD2 interceptor dongle and the “scan me Tesla” app.

Weisblat’s measurements of both motors on each vehicle reveal that both the Front and Rear motors on the Model Y have a higher energy output than that of the Model 3, despite them being the same. The front motor of the Model Y has a higher output by 18 kW, while the rear motor of the Model Y is producing 15.5 kW more energy. Why would Tesla decide to have the Model Y’s motors both produce more power than the Model 3’s? Weisblat has a theory.

“I’m thinking the motors [on both vehicles] are the same, and they’re just giving more power to the Model Y to make it a little bit quicker to compensate for the weight,” Weisblat implies. However, a higher horsepower doesn’t necessarily mean a faster vehicle, especially in a quarter-mile setting.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Weisblat took the following power out reading on his Model Y with Performance Upgrade and Model 3 Performance:

Tesla Model Y Performance Power Output

  • Maximum Discharge Power: 433 kW
  • Maximum Battery Power: 402 kW
  • Maximum Front Motor Power: 198.5 kW
  • Maximum Rear Motor Power: 270.5 kW

Tesla Model 3 Performance Power Output

  • Maximum Discharge Power: 431 kW
  • Maximum Battery Power: 416 kW
  • Maximum Front Motor Power: 180.5 kW
  • Maximum Rear Motor Power: 255 kW

Based on the power output readings from both vehicles, it appears that Model 3 Performance is limited to approximately 579.215 horsepower, while the output from Model Y’s electric motors churn out roughly 44.56 more horsepower at a total 623.77 horsepower.

Recently, the Model Y Performance was pegged against the Model 3 Performance in a drag race performed by Tesla enthusiast Brian Jenkins of i1Tesla. The race found that the Model 3 Performance was the quicker of the two vehicles on a quarter-mile drag strip, however, 0-60 sprints proved very similar.

Tesla’s ability to increase power output in their vehicles isn’t something new to the Silicon Valley-based electric carmaker. The company released a 5% power boost via an over-the-air software update in late 2019, ahead of its regular “Holiday Update”. Because Model Y Performance shares the same electric motors as its sibling Model 3, yet determined to have higher power output, one can presume that Model 3 Performance may still have a few extra electrons that can be “uncorked” down the road.

Watch DragTimes’ Model Y Performance vs. Model 3 Performance power output test below.

Tesla Model Y power reading shows Model 3 Performance can get even quicker

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla Model Y power reading shows Model 3 Performance can get even quicker»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-y-electric-motors-power-output/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134594»;

Comments
Teilen:

NASA has good news after SpaceX Crew Dragon parachute test accident


NASA has good news after SpaceX suffered an accident that destroyed a Crew Dragon mockup before it could complete a parachute test, indicating that the anomaly could have minimal impact on the spacecraft’s Demo-2 astronaut launch debut.

According to NASA, SpaceX and the space agency are still working to launch astronauts on Crew Dragon as early as “mid-to-late May”. While two recent challenges – the loss of the spacecraft’s most important parachute testing mockup and an unrelated in-flight rocket engine failure – could both singlehandedly delay Demo-2 in certain scenarios, NASA continues to state that a May timeframe is still in the cards. This is an excellent sign that both issues – as previously speculated on Teslarati – are probably much less of a problem than they otherwise could be.

As of now, all Demo-2 hardware – including Falcon 9 booster B1058, a new Falcon upper stage, Crew Dragon capsule C206, and an expendable Dragon trunk – are all believed to be in Florida and technically ready for flight. Waiting for launch at and around Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Launch Complex 39A, the long straw for SpaceX’s inaugural astronaut launch is most likely the completion of formal paperwork and reviews, most of which must be done primarily by NASA employees. SpaceX’s latest technical challenges certainly toss some uncertainty into the mix and serve as a reminder that nothing can or should be taken for granted in human spaceflight but on the whole, there is reason for optimism.

SpaceX began a final round of Crew Dragon parachute testing in January 2020 after a string of successes in Q4 2019. The capsule mockup pictured above was unfortunately destroyed during a helicopter-related incident in March. (SpaceX)
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

“To date, SpaceX has completed 24 tests of its upgraded Mark 3 parachute design they are working to certify for use on the Crew Dragon spacecraft that will fly NASA astronauts to the International Space Station. The system was used during the SpaceX in-flight abort test in January.

On March 24, SpaceX lost a spacecraft-like device used to test the Crew Dragon Mark 3 parachute design. The test requires a helicopter to lift the device suspended underneath it to reach the needed test parameters. However, the pilot proactively dropped the device in an abundance of caution to protect the test crew as the test device became unstable underneath the helicopter. At the time of the release, the testing device was not armed, and a test of the parachute design was not performed.

Although losing a test device is never a desired outcome, NASA and SpaceX always will prioritize the safety of our teams over hardware. We are looking at the parachute testing plan now and all the data we already have to determine the next steps ahead of flying the upcoming Demo-2 flight test in the mid-to-late May timeframe.”

NASA.gov — March 26th, 2020

While the challenges SpaceX and NASA still have to surmount are thus significant, it’s safe to say that Crew Dragon’s track record more than earns it some optimism as the spacecraft nears the T-1 month mark for what will arguably SpaceX’s most significant launch ever.

Following a successful Pad Abort test in May 2015, the company spent several years working head down. In mid-2018, SpaceX’s first finished Crew Dragon spacecraft successfully passed through electromagnetic interference (EMI) and thermal vacuum (TVac) testing, arriving at the launch site for preflight processing by July. Unfortunately, for unknown reasons, it took more than half a year more for NASA to finally permit Crew Dragon to launch.

A month and a half after completing an integrated static fire test at Pad 39A, Falcon 9 and Crew Dragon lifted off for the first time ever on March 2nd, 2019. A flawless launch was followed by an equally flawless International Space Station (ISS) rendezvous and docking, completed autonomously and without issue on SpaceX’s first try. Crew Dragon capsule C201 spent five days at the station before autonomously departing, reentering Earth’s atmosphere, and gently splashing down in the Atlantic Ocean under four healthy parachutes.

Altogether, Crew Dragon’s orbital launch debut was such a flawless success that SpaceX’s own director of Crew Dragon mission management stated that he could barely believe how perfectly it went – likely expecting at least something to go slightly awry. That near-perfection certainly didn’t come easily for SpaceX. Boeing – NASA’s second Commercial Crew Program (CCP) partner – has had a far rougher go of things despite the fact that the company does technically have extensive experience building aircraft and rockets.

Boeing’s unfortunate Starliner struggles help to emphasize just how strong SpaceX’s current standing really is. (Richard Angle)

In November 2019, Boeing completed Starliner’s first fully integrated ‘flight’ test in the form of a pad abort. While the spacecraft was able to perform a soft landing, mishandling and bad quality control caused one of its three main parachutes to fail to deploy in an unintentional stress test. A little over a month later, a separate Starliner spacecraft performed its inaugural orbital launch on a ULA Atlas V rocket. From the moment Starliner separated from Atlas V, things began to go wrong. It would ultimately become clear that extremely shoddy software and an almost nonexistent integrated testing regime caused the spacecraft to waste most of its propellant and resulted in an extremely delayed orbital insertion.

While NASA and Boeing both managed to forget a second partial failure until media reporting shed light on it months later, it also turned out that another entirely separate instance of incomplete software may have nearly destroyed Starliner a matter of hours before it was scheduled to reenter Earth’s atmosphere. The spacecraft was ultimately prevented from even attempting a space station rendezvous, one of the major purposes of the test flight.

Falcon 9 B1046 lifted off for the fourth and final time on January 19th, sacrificed so its Crew Dragon payload could perform a flawless in-flight abort (IFA) test. (Richard Angle)
Crew Dragon lifted off on a Falcon 9 rocket for the second time ever on January 19th, 2020. (Richard Angle)
The Dragon In-Flight Abort (IFA) test that followed is believed to have gone exactly as planned. Left up to providers by NASA, Boeing decided early on not to perform a similar real-world Starliner IFA test. (SpaceX)

In simpler terms, Crew Dragon – even with the challenges it has and will soon face – is just shy of primed and ready for flight. As always, it’s better to be safe (and late) than sorry in human spaceflight, particularly the first such mission for SpaceX, but it’s looking increasingly likely that Crew Dragon will be on the launch pad and preparing to lift off with NASA astronauts just two or so months from now.

NASA has good news after SpaceX Crew Dragon parachute test accident

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «NASA has good news after SpaceX Crew Dragon parachute test accident»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/nasa-spacex-crew-dragon-test-accident-good-news/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134532»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla Model Y drag races Model X “Raven”, and Model 3 in 1/4-mile test


A Tesla Model Y Performance drag raced a Model 3 Performance and Model X Performance Raven in a test to determine how the newest all-electric crossover from Tesla stacked up against its siblings.

Brian Jenkins from YouTube channel i1Tesla took his Model X Raven, a Model 3 Performance, and his brand new Model Y Performance to the NCCAR drag strip in Northampton County, North Carolina, for a quarter-mile test between the three vehicles. Jenkins planned to measure the Model Y against both the Model 3 and Model X during separate runs, predicting that the Model X Performance with 100 kWh battery pack would stand as king of the hill.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The first race paired the Model Y Performance up against the Model 3 Performance. While the Model 3 won the race easily, the Model Y held its own. The all-electric crossover recorded a quarter-mile time of 12.04 seconds, just over four-tenths of a second behind the Model 3 Performance’s time of 11.63 seconds, with the Model Y reaching 113.05 MPH, while the Model 3 maxed out at 114.05 MPH.

The next run between the Model X and Model Y showed the new crossover’s speed against the most powerful vehicle of the three tested. The Model X Raven pushed an 11.28-second lap at 119.27 MPH, making it easily the fastest and most powerful car on the strip during this testing session.

While the Model Y was the slowest of the three, Jenkins was still impressed with its performance and has a theory on why the vehicle is not as fast as it could be. “I think that is software,” he said. “I think they’re doing that to protect it because it is so early on. There will be a software update to make it launch like the Model 3.”

A comparison of the three vehicles shows how they differ and what each car offers in performance.

  • Tesla Model Y Performance
    • 75 kWh Battery Pack
    • 450 Horsepower
    • Advertised 0-60 MPH in 3.5 Seconds
    • 155 MPH top speed
    • 280-mile EPA estimated range
  • Tesla Model 3 Performance
    • 75 kWh Battery Pack
    • 450 Horsepower
    • Advertised 0-60 MPH in 3.2 Seconds
    • 162 MPH top speed
    • 322-mile EPA estimated range
  • Tesla Model X Performance “Raven”
    • 100 kWh Battery Pack
    • 762 Horsepower
    • Advertised 0-60 MPH in 2.9 seconds
    • 163 MPH top speed
    • 305-mile EPA estimated range

Tesla started deliveries of the Model Y in mid-March, and the company has made arrangements through a new “contactless delivery” system to ensure those who have ordered can still get their hands on the latest Tesla vehicle.

Watch Brian from i1Tesla’s video on the quarter-mile race of the Model X “Raven,” Model Y Performance, and Model 3 Performance below.

Tesla Model Y drag races Model X “Raven”, and Model 3 in 1/4-mile test

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla Model Y drag races Model X «Raven», and Model 3 in 1/4-mile test»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-y-drag-race-1-4-mile-vs-model-x-vs-model-3/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134278»;

Comments
Teilen:

SpaceX Starship rocket rolls to launch pad to prepare for Starhopper-style hop test


SpaceX has finished its third full-scale Starship prototype and rolled the rocket’s tank and engine section to a nearby launch pad just a matter of weeks after work began, now ready to prepare for a potentially imminent Starhopper-style hop test.

SpaceX’s rapidly-growing Boca Chica, Texas Starship factory is now producing so much rocket hardware that it’s hard to track any single vehicle’s birth. However, it still appears that SpaceX’s Texas team managed to complete the Starship SN3 prototype in less than a month, measured from first steel ring stacking to the ship’s integrated business end being transported to the launch pad. Simultaneously, the company fabricated, assembled, and tested an entirely separate Starship test tank, verifying that a design flaw that likely lead to Starship SN1’s February 28th destruction had been rectified.

Featuring the same design improvements that allowed that Starship test tank to become the first to pass proof testing intact, Starship SN3 is the best candidate yet to kick off true wet dress rehearsal (WDR) and Raptor engine static fire testing. Both will require real liquid methane and oxygen propellant to be loaded, potentially turning Starship SN3 into the equivalent of many tons of TNT if things were to go south. To be clear, there is a significant chance that such an early, rapidly-built prototype will not survive its upcoming test campaign. Nevertheless, Starship SN3 has the numerous lessons learned from both the successes and failures of all previous vehicles built into it, giving it the best chance yet. Still, the massive rocket will need to pass one or several less risky tests before it can begin to attempt more groundbreaking feats.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Set to follow in the footsteps of all previous Starship test articles, SpaceX will soon kick off Starship SN3’s test campaign with a liquid nitrogen proof test – still extremely cold (i.e. cryogenic) but chemically neutral (i.e. can’t explode). Delivery trucks were spotted topping off SpaceX’s liquid nitrogen supplies just yesterday. The company also has a four-hour road closure scheduled to start at 5pm CDT (22:00 UTC) today, shortly after this article went live.

SpaceX moved (half of) its first flightworthy Starship prototype – SN1 – to the launch pad on February 25th. (SPadre)
On February 28th, Starship SN1 was destroyed by a design flaw in its “thrust puck”, the structure that Raptor engines would have attached to. (NASASpaceflight – bocachicagal)
One month (30 days) later, Starship SN3’s completed engine section was craned onto a Roll Lift transporter in the middle of the night, arriving at SpaceX’s nearby launch pad on March 29th. (NASASpaceflight – bocachicagal)

If it isn’t delayed, that March 29th road closure is likely meant to allow SpaceX to pressurize Starship SN3 with liquid nitrogen, pushing it beyond flight pressures (6 bar/90 psi) in what’s known as a proof test. If successful, it would verify that the rocket’s tank section is sound while also bringing it to cryogenic temperatures, potentially strengthening the steel with cryogenic hardening.

Just hours later, SpaceX technicians lifted the Starship tank section onto the launch mount, where it will be prepared for imminent proof testing. (SPadre)

Beyond those initial plans, the FAA license SpaceX used to support Starhopper’s July and August 2019 hop tests may actually enable test flights of full-scale Starship prototypes, too. Incredibly, according to Cameron County, Texas beach closure requests made on March 23rd, SpaceX’s goal is to prepare Starship SN3 for a Raptor engine static fire test as early as April 1st (no fool), followed by a potential 150m (500 ft) Starhopper-style flight test on April 6th.

For obvious reasons, delays to that ambitious schedule – particularly the flight test – are extremely likely, but Starship SN3 is now unequivocally at the launch pad. Stay tuned for updates on the rocket’s potentially imminent proof test and the impacts that might have on future tests.

SpaceX Starship rocket rolls to launch pad to prepare for Starhopper-style hop test

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «SpaceX Starship rocket rolls to launch pad to prepare for Starhopper-style hop test»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-starship-sn3-launch-pad-hop-test-prep/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134419»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla owner in CA goes full “Cyber Club Mode” in ultimate DIY project during shelter in place


California-based Tesla Model 3 owner Dr. Gregory Chew took his passion for music and car customizations to a whole new level by installing a unique LED fiber optic kit in the ultimate do-it-yourself project.

The aftermarket LED upgrade does more than just light the interior cabin of his all-electric sedan and can be seen as a Tesla “Cyber Club Mode” that can synchronize its lighting effect to music playing through Model 3’s sound system.

Dr. Chew’s inspiration behind the project came from watching a show on the Mercedes Vision AVTR, a supercar released by the German luxury vehicle manufacturer. “It had Tron-like lighting in the edge of the front seats. I started searching the internet to look at different options currently offered. XKGLOW has a good reliability report and used the least amount of power to run,” Chew tells Teslarati.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla Model 3 Fiber Optic LED Kit

Chew tells us that he ultimately installed the XKGLOW.COM fiber optic LED kit, after testing an array of products from various distributors on eBay and Amazon, Chew says the kit from XKGLOW was superior in build quality and energy efficiency. “I tested out several different lighting company manufacturers…but the quality and endurance of XKGLOW’s product line is far and above the BEST that I tested,” Chew said. “Comparative lighting use too much power, and replacement of failing parts would be a pain.”

Chew installed the following components in this Model 3 to make for the ultimate cyber club inside his car.

  • 40 feet of Fiber Optic Roll (sold in 6’ lengths)
  • 12 XKCHROME RGB LED 5v Heads (each headlights nicely for about 3 feet)
  • 1 Bluetooth Smartphone XKCHROME App Controller (to power the 12v LED parts)
  • 4 XKCHROME RGB LED 12” 12v Tubes (placed to light each footwell)
  • 4 XKCHROME RGB LED 12v Mini-Pods (placed above each door’s cupholder area)
  • 18 1-to-3 Splitter Blocks
  • 20 (6 foot) XKCHROME Extension Wires (Some included in the kit)
  • 14 (3 foot) XKCHROME Extension Wires (Some included in the kit)

The fiber optic LED kit can be performed as a DIY project, however, according to details on XKGKOW’s website, installations can also be performed by qualified installers in each area. Chew said he chose to take on the project himself, and enjoys the process he describes as “an art”.

 

Tesla vehicles are very customizable when cosmetic options are concerned, and these interior LED lights are no exception. Chew’s cabin design with the music-synched lights is undoubtedly one of the coolest around, and the video of his system has amassed nearly 20,000 views.

Tesla owner in CA goes full “Cyber Club Mode” in ultimate DIY project during shelter in place

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla owner in CA goes full «Cyber Club Mode» in ultimate DIY project during shelter in place»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-glowing-led-lighting-diy-project-xkglow/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134472»;

Comments
Teilen:

SpaceX wins NASA contract to deliver cargo to Lunar Gateway moon outpost


SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft has delivered cargo to the International Space Station, but soon it will carry goods to an orbit higher than the International Space Station: the lunar Gateway.

Agency officials announced Friday (March 27) that NASA selected SpaceX as the first commercial company to be contracted to deliver cargo to the upcoming Gateway. The California-based aerospace company will deliver cargo to lunar orbit, including research experiments, astronaut supplies, sample collection hardware, and more.

NASA has plans of returning to the moon, and an essential piece of architecture in that quest is a small space station, dubbed Gateway, that will orbit the moon. Construction on the lunar outpost is scheduled to begin in 2022, as part of the space agency’s larger effort to establish a long-term presence on the moon.

The moon will be a testbed to help the agency and its partners develop and test the technology needed for human missions to Mars. And the Gateway is a big part of that. The small space station will serve as a command post for both crewed and uncrewed excursions to the lunar surface. It will also serve as a facility for research experiments.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Currently, SpaceX uses its Falcon 9 rocket to ferry cargo Dragon spacecraft to the space station. Each craft is capable of transporting around six metric tons (or 13,200 lbs.) to low-Earth orbit. After delivering its cargo, Dragon typically remains attached to the ISS for about a month before returning to Earth.

For the upcoming lunar missions, SpaceX proposed using its Falcon Heavy rocket to ferry a modified version of its Dragon spacecraft to the future outpost. The spacecraft, called Dragon XL, would deliver more than five metric tons of cargo, and the craft would stay docked for up to 12 months.

Currently, SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft delivers cargo to and from the space station. Credit: NASA

“Returning to the moon and supporting future space exploration requires affordable delivery of significant amounts of cargo,” said Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX president, and COO. “Through our partnership with NASA, SpaceX has been delivering scientific research and critical supplies to the International Space Station since 2012, and we are honored to continue the work beyond Earth’s orbit and carry Artemis cargo to the Gateway.”

NASA first announced it was looking for companies to deliver cargo to the upcoming lunar station last summer; SpaceX is the first to be awarded a contract.

“This contract award is another crucial piece of our plan to return to the moon sustainably,” said NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine. “The Gateway is the cornerstone of the long-term Artemis architecture, and this deep space commercial cargo capability integrates yet another American industry partner into our plans for human exploration at the moon in preparation for a future mission to Mars.”

SpaceX plans to use its Starship spacecraft to deliver robotic landers to the lunar surface. Credit: SpaceX

Although SpaceX is the first, NASA is expected to announce at least one more company that will deliver cargo to the Gateway. To that end, the agency set aside a total of $7 billion (to be spent over a period of 12 to 15 years) for the delivery services. Each company selected will be guaranteed at least two missions.

NASA’s goal is to return to the moon by 2024 and to do so sustainably. To that end, the agency is relying on the commercial industry to help out. So far, the space agency has already awarded contracts for the Gateway’s power and propulsion element as well as a small habitat module.

But that’s not all; the space agency is also taking proposals for landing services. Last November, SpaceX announced its interest and that it planned to use its Starship to deliver robotic landers to the lunar surface. Starship was originally designed to ferry people to Mars, but like the rest of the lunar program, the first step for it could be delivering payloads to the moon.

SpaceX wins NASA contract to deliver cargo to Lunar Gateway moon outpost

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «SpaceX wins NASA contract to deliver cargo to Lunar Gateway moon outpost»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-dragon-xl-nasa-lunar-gateway/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134399»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla owner fights for warranty after breaking Model 3 drivetrain with tank tracks


A Tesla owner who installed tank tracks on his Model 3 is currently fighting for the vehicle’s warranty after the vehicle’s drive unit and axles were damaged.

Michael of the lowlifeduramax YouTube channel shared his story over Twitter on Friday, noting that Tesla had voided the warranty on his three-month-old Model 3 that broke down.

In a series of tweets aimed at members of the Tesla community, including CEO Elon Musk, Michael indicated his encounter with the company’s service representatives. Tweeting a photo of his Model 3 on the back of a flatbed service truck, Michael was informed that his vehicle’s electric motor failed.

Source: @lowlifeduramax via Twitter

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The YouTuber’s snow track joyride compromised the vehicle’s drivetrain by applying excessive amounts of stress on both the front and rear axle, suggests Michael in his tweet. “Tesla states snow track with 50% gear reduction caused excess heat on the drive unit 5mph and less.” 

According to “Tesla Parts, Body and Paint Repair Limited Warranty” handbook, damages as a result of vehicle modifications, including the installation of accessories, would not be covered.

“This Tesla Parts, Body & Paint Limited Warranty does not cover any damage or malfunction directly or indirectly caused by, due to, or resulting from, normal wear or deterioration, abuse, misuse, negligence, accident, collision, impact, lack of or improper use, maintenance, storage or transport, including, but not limited to, any of the following:

Failure to contact Tesla upon discovery of a defect covered by this Tesla Parts, Body & Paint Repair Limited Warranty; any repair, alteration or modification to covered Parts, or the installation or use of any Parts or accessories, made by a person or facility not authorized or certified to do so.”

Tesla Model 3 Drive Unit. (Credit: YouTube | Ingineerix)

Drawing ire from some members of the Tesla community who supported the company’s decision to void the vehicle’s warranty, Michael replied, “[Tesla] shouldn’t claim 1 mil mile motors and ‘built like truck.’” Another follower of the incident made the suggestion to try the same stunt with an electric truck, implying that a battery-electric pickup may be more suitable than a sedan for this type of experiment. Michael noted that Tesla vehicles are “weak,” because his gas-powered vehicles, including his truck, have been able to handle these types of modifications without any issue.

Despite Tesla’s initial diagnosis that the aftermarket modifications caused the damages to the vehicle, Michael maintains the vehicle’s drive unit should not have failed so quickly. While it is unfortunate that Michael will be stuck with a $7,000 tab to get his Model 3 up and running, a quick readthrough of the warranty manual would have clarified any concerns the installation of the snow tracks may have brought up.

Tesla owner fights for warranty after breaking Model 3 drivetrain with tank tracks

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla owner fights for warranty after breaking Model 3 drivetrain with tank tracks»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-mode-3-tank-tracks-lowlifeduramax-voided-warranty/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134495»;

Comments
Teilen:

Top 6 Tesla Model Y hidden tidbits that you didn’t know


Tesla Model Y is full of new convenience features that make the ownership experience of the electric crossover second to none. However, what goes unseen are secret tidbits that Tesla engineers implemented in the Model Y that make it stand even further apart from other vehicles in its category.

YouTuber and Tesla owner Tesla Raj delved into his six favorite “secrets” of the Model Y that you may not know of.

Magnetic Sun Visors

The first change on the Model Y that Raj notes as one of his favorites on the new crossover is the magnetic sun visor “clip.” In past Tesla vehicles, like the Model 3, the sun visor has utilized a clip and bar system, where the bar snaps into the clip, locking the visor into place.

Tesla improved upon the visor by implementing a magnet system that simply closes the visor into place without excessive pulling or pushing that can create a hassle for a driver when operating the vehicle. The visor still extends and is maneuverable so it can be adjusted to block the sun at any angle. The magnetic system creates a more relaxed lodging and dislodging experience for drivers when they would like to use it to keep the bright light in the sky out of their eyes.

The Model Y’s magnetic sun visor. (Credit: YouTube/Tesla Raj)

Door Seals

Arguably, one of the most satisfying feelings that define luxury over economy is the sound of a closing door.

Tesla has installed a sturdier, thicker, and firmer door seal with the Model Y, creating a distinctive and robust sound indicating the car door is sealed shut. Raj compared the sound Model Y makes when shutting the door with that of the Model 3 and took notice of a deeper and sturdier sound from the all-electric crossover. Moreover, the seal in the Model Y is of better quality and contours around the vehicle’s curves with more precision over Model 3.

The Model Y’s new and improved door seals. (Credit: YouTube/Tesla Raj)
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Trunk Vents

Model Y includes trunk vents on both corners of the rear trunk where the side compartments are located. The driver’s side vent houses the Charge Port pull tab, that can alleviate a jammed charging port door if it becomes stuck.

The passenger side vent contains the vehicle’s subwoofer and acts as relief for the air that pushes through the speaker.

Under-Seat Storage Space

The driver’s and passenger’s seats of the Model Y both have a 5″ tall by 14″ wide by 7″ long space beneath them, creating the impression that it could be used to store anything from books, to games, to possibly a homemade drawer under it. Raj believes someone with the proper craftsmanship could build a small drawer that could be fashioned under the seat, creating extra storage space any sort of object. With kids, this could be a perfect opportunity to store coloring books, handheld game systems, DVDs, or other entertainment outlets during a long drive.

The Model Y’s under-seat storage. (Credit: YouTube/Tesla Raj)

Hood/Frunk Polymer Seal

The frunk on previous Tesla models seemed to have a considerable space between the actual frunk door and the bottom of the storage compartment, leaving space for items, like food or drinks, to move around excessively. This increased the risk of spillage or movement, so Tesla created a large seal that gets rid of this extra space. The storage is still the same as the seal does not pass the upper-outer lip of the frunk, but it certainly creates a more secure environment for whatever is stored in the compartment.

The Model Y’s frunk seal. (Credit: YouTube/Tesla Raj)

Pedestrian Warning Speaker

In Early September 2019, Tesla complied with the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) mandate that required electric vehicles traveling below 19 MPH to omit a noise to increase pedestrian awareness of quiet electric cars. Model 3’s manufactured around that time were all outfitted with this speaker, and it appears the Model Y also has speakers as well. While the mandate does not go into effect until September 2020.

Tesla Raj’s full video on six Model Y secrets is below.

Top 6 Tesla Model Y hidden tidbits that you didn’t know

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Top 6 Tesla Model Y hidden tidbits that you didn’t know»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-y-hidden-features-tidbits/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134452»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla CEO Elon Musk commits to support of NYC in coronavirus relief efforts


New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio extended words of gratitude toward CEO Elon Musk on Friday, in response to Tesla’s commitment to donate ventilators to New York, which has become the epicenter of coronavirus cases in the US.

“You’re most welcome. Credit to the Tesla team. Will do our best to help in any way,” said Musk, in reply to de Blasio’s outreach.

Musk added that the most effective way to fight the shortage of ventilators is to recognize the exact locations of where they are needed and get them to those hospitals in an efficient fashion. “Biggest value Tesla is providing is the precise delivery of ventilators exactly to the ICU where & when they’re needed. There are many ventilators in warehouses, but stuck in logistics/routing/paperwork issues,” Musk stated.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

A follower of Musk on Twitter then asked if Tesla would begin charging hospitals or medical facilities for ventilators that they either buy or manufacture themselves.

Musk clarified that he or his company would accept any compensation for the machines that will help save lives. “We will give away all our ventilators, whether we buy them or build them,” the Tesla CEO said.

The donation of ventilators from Musk to the city came in response to de Blasio’s request for help on March 19. On that day, Musk tweeted that Tesla would be willing to manufacture ventilators if there was a shortage. The tweet incited a response from de Blasio, who stated, “New York City is buying!”

 

In the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, Musk has stated the best response is to remain calm and not panic. While Tesla’s facilities in Fremont, California, and Buffalo, New York remain closed for production, their doors are opening for the manufacturing of third party ventilator systems. Initially, Musk struck up a conversation with a team from Medtronics. This conversation eventually led to Tesla offering its Fremont plant as a manufacturing facility for the medical equipment company to increase its production of ventilators. CEO Omar Ishrak confirmed the partnership between Tesla and Medtronics on CNBC on Wednesday.

Musk’s efforts span outside of New York. Earlier this week, he delivered 1,200 ventilators to the city of Los Angeles free of charge. China had an excess of ventilators, so Musk took it upon himself to purchase them and deliver the systems to Los Angeles to assist with COVID-19 affected patients. Tesla’s effort to help with the ventilator shortage will more than likely help patients with severe respiratory problems get the help they need, especially with the massive deficit in machines compared to severe cases of the virus.

While Fremont remains partially opened for some workers to help with loading Tesla vehicles onto haulers for delivery, Giga New York remains closed, even though many New York officials are requesting the plant be reopened for ventilator production.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk commits to support of NYC in coronavirus relief efforts

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla CEO Elon Musk commits to support of NYC in coronavirus relief efforts»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-elon-musk-nyc-mayor-coronavirus-ventilator-support/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-134464»;

Comments
Teilen: