Tesla gets vote of confidence over FSD tech, board updates in run-up to Q1 earnings


Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) might be attracting a notable degree of skepticism as it heads towards its first-quarter earnings call, but the company is still receiving support from one of its biggest bulls. In a note following Tesla’s Autonomy Day, Canaccord analyst Jed Dorsheimer highlighted the electric car maker’s lead in the EV market, as well as the potential of its full self-driving technology.

Dorsheimer reiterated his “Buy” rating and his optimistic $391 per share price target for Tesla. According to the Canaccord analyst, if Tesla rolls out its autonomous driving software in a timeline that’s close to its targets, the company will have a formidable lead against its rivals in the FSD sphere. “We continue to see Tesla as the clear leader in EVs, and if anything remotely close to the timeline for Level 5 capabilities that the company has laid out occurs, the formidable lead that the company has in autonomy will result in meaningful market share gains,” he said.

The Canaccord analyst also noted that Tesla’s decision to reduce the members of its board of directors from 11 to 7 could be seen as a sign that the company is developing a more balanced corporate governance, considering that the three outgoing board members are widely considered as having close ties with Elon Musk.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Other analysts are not as optimistic. Garrett Nelson, an analyst with CFRA, has noted that Tesla’s Q1 earnings could be an “outright disaster,” considering that Elon Musk himself mentioned a potential loss as early as the end of February. “Our suspicion is that Q1 EPS could be an outright disaster, given that Tesla guided for a loss with an entire month left in the quarter, and its inherently high degree of operating leverage. We know what Q1 deliveries were, but how did average price realizations and unit costs hold up amid its announced price cuts and a reduced mix of higher-priced Model S and X vehicles?” Nelson said.

Karl Brauer, an analyst with Kelley Blue Book, also shared his reservations about the company, including concerns about the increasing competition from rival automakers. “That’s good news for the consumer, but not so good for Tesla. The increased competition will make it difficult for Tesla to assume they can build as many cars as possible and there will always be a customer waiting to buy them, as the market saw with the first-quarter delivery miss,” he said.

Expectations are tempered for Tesla’s first quarter results, with Wall St. looking to a quarterly loss of $1.84 per share based on standard accounting methods and a non-GAAP loss of $0.99 per share on revenue of about $5.46 billion, according to FactSet.

Tesla shares have been off around 20% this year so far, compared to a roughly 16% rise for the broader S&P 500.

Tesla will be releasing its first quarter financial results after markets close today, April 24, 2019. The company’s earnings will begin at 2:30 p.m. Pacific Time (5:30 p.m. Eastern Time). Tesla’s financial report for the first quarter can be accessed here.

As of writing, Tesla shares are trading up -0.68% at $262.11 per share.

Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of TSLA and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.

Tesla gets vote of confidence over FSD tech, board updates in run-up to Q1 earnings


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla gets vote of confidence over FSD tech, board updates in run-up to Q1 earnings»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-tsla-q1-2019-earnings-fsd-autonomy-day-board-updates/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-102247»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla posts Full Self-Driving demo video with stop sign, traffic light recognition


Tesla has released a video demonstration of its Full Self-Driving suite in action. The short video clip follows a Model 3 as it autonomously drove from one destination to another, following stop signs, recognizing traffic lights, and driving on city streets in the process.

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving strategy is centered around custom hardware that the company has developed and a large neural network that continues to get more proficient as it gains more real-world driving data. The recognition capabilities of Tesla’s neural network was on display in the recently shared FSD demo video, as the Model 3 could be seen reacting appropriately once it encountered objects like stop signs and traffic lights.

The ride chronicled in the recently shared demonstration involved zero manual interventions from the passenger on the driver’s seat. Nevertheless, it should still be noted that operators of Tesla’s autonomous vehicles will still need to be observant of the road even when Full Self-Driving becomes “feature complete” by the end of this year, as mentioned by Elon Musk during an appearance at ARK Invest’s For Your Innovation podcast.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

“I think we will be feature complete — full self-driving — this year. I would say I am certain of that. That is not a question mark. However, people sometimes will extrapolate that to mean now it works with 100 percent certainty, requires no observation, perfectly. This is not the case,” he said.

Tesla conducted test drives of its Full Self-Driving features after the presentations of Musk, VP of Hardware Engineering Pete Bannon, Sr. Director of AI Andrej Karpathy, and VP of Engineering Stuart Bowers, though the company reportedly did not allow videos to be taken during the test rides themselves. Fortunately, Axosoft founder Hamid Shojaee described his FSD experience in a series of tweets. Shojaee noted that the demo ride of the fully autonomous drive was really impressive. “Parking lot to city streets, to freeway, to city streets back to parking lot, ~10 mile drive, 100% autonomous. Tesla is light years ahead,” he wrote.

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving suite is a key component of Elon Musk’s Master Plan, which calls for the deployment of the Tesla Network’s autonomous Robotaxis that commuters could summon using an app. This will allow Tesla to become a key player in the ride-sharing market, which is currently dominated by Uber and Lyft. Musk noted that Tesla’s Robotaxis will cost around $0.18 per mile, undercutting Uber and Lyft’s $2-$3 cost per mile. Considering the lifespan of Tesla’s battery packs and drivetrain, the Musk expects each Robotaxi to make a gross profit of $0.65 per mile assuming that 50% were empty miles, and an annual mileage of 90,000 miles, resulting in one vehicle earning about $30,000 per year.

Watch Tesla’s video demonstration of its Full Self-Driving suite in action in the video below.

Tesla posts Full Self-Driving demo video with stop sign, traffic light recognition


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla posts Full Self-Driving demo video with stop sign, traffic light recognition»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-full-self-driving-stop-sign-traffic-light-demo-video/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-102089»;

Comments
Teilen:

NVIDIA says Tesla raised the bar for self-driving tech, car makers must deliver


NVIDIA, a prominent and highly successful leader in computer chip design, says that Tesla has raised the bar in autonomous driving software, and other car makers will have to deliver similar performance if they want to compete in the long-term future of the auto industry, according to a recent NVIDIA company blog.

“It’s financially insane to buy anything other than a Tesla,” CEO Elon Musk stated during the company’s Autonomy Day event. He then compared the purchase of any other car as equivalent to buying a horse for one’s transportation purposes. NVIDIA, for its part, agrees with Musk and Tesla’s sentiments about the future of self-driving and the need for powerful computers to push its progress.

“Self-driving cars—which are key to new levels of safety, efficiency, and convenience—are the future of the industry. And they require massive amounts of computing performance… This is the way forward. Every other automaker will need to deliver this level of performance,” the chip maker wrote.

The type of autonomous driving technology Tesla is pushing is predicted to be the inevitable standard, and the company’s lead in the arena will likely increase even further as more of their vehicles take to the road. “By end of this quarter, about half a million Teslas will have full self-driving hardware (pending computer swap) & we will make another half million FSD cars by mid next year,” Musk tweeted, emphasizing this point and echoing what he’d explained the day prior.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla’s recent Autonomy Day presentation drew comparisons between the all-electric car maker’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) computer chip and those produced by NVIDIA, the only computer processing unit maker delivering performance in line with Tesla’s. NVIDIA currently has two self-driving chips in the works: the Xavier SoC (system on a chip) for assisted driving AutoPilot features, and the DRIVE AGX Pegasus computer for full self-driving. The comparisons in Tesla’s presentation were directed at the Xavier in a single-chip configuration.

The technical performance specifications required to run powerful artificial intelligence (AI) neural networks (NN) for autonomous driving require operations performed per second to be measured in the trillions – abbreviated as TOPS (tera operations per second). Tesla’s FSD computer chip can perform at a rate of 72 TOPS (x2 chips in the computer for 144 TOPS total), and the Xavier does 30 TOPS (mistakenly claimed to be 21 TOPS at Tesla’s event, per NVIDIA’s blog).

NVIDIA also expressed in the blog piece its opinion that the match between FSD and Xavier wasn’t quite an apples-to-apples comparison, given the purposes of the two chips. The chip designer prefers its DRIVE AGX Pegasus for the line-up, a computer intended for fully autonomous driving and capable of 320 TOPS. Tesla is assumingly aware of this product and obviously acknowledges the high level of technology developed by NVIDIA given that Hardware 2.5, the computer currently running Tesla’s Autopilot features, was made by the company.

A Tesla with driver features “deleted” under the Tesla Network. | Image: Tesla

There are additional specifications such as power consumption that further differentiate FSD from NVIDIA’s products with a more similar purpose to Tesla’s latest computer. Thus, a different product match may not have mattered towards the overall point being made in the presentation. Either way, a more important distinction between the two companies is the current status of their technologies.

Tesla’s chip was crowned as “objectively the best in the world” by Musk, and this looks to be true, given the fact that all Tesla Model S, 3, and X vehicles being produced now have the hardware installed and will add to the already accruing real world self-driving data the company’s cars provide. NVIDIA has partnered with other car manufacturers to develop its products, but they are not incorporated in production vehicles the way Tesla’s FSD has been yet.

The performance Tesla has achieved in its FSD computer is impressive, and that was and continues to be the point. “[Autonomy] is basically our entire expense structure,” Musk told an investor inquiring about where the California-based company was incurring the most cost. Tesla is hedging its fiscal future on the success of autonomous driving in the marketplace, and the company is doing so with bullish energy driven by its famous top executive.

Musk expects Tesla’s Full Self-Driving software to be complete by the end of this year and fully operational by the second quarter of next year.

NVIDIA says Tesla raised the bar for self-driving tech, car makers must deliver


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «NVIDIA says Tesla raised the bar for self-driving tech, car makers must deliver»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/nvidia-response-tesla-ai-self-driving-chip/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-102172»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla (TSLA) dips as Elon Musk’s Robotaxi service meets skepticism from Wall St.


Tesla stock (NASDAQ:TSLA) dropped on Tuesday morning as Elon Musk’s vision for the Tesla Network’s Robotaxi service was met by skepticism from Wall Street. Musk was quite confident in the recently-held Autonomy Day event, stating that Tesla could start deploying its autonomous ride-hailing vehicles by 2020. Wall Street did not seem to be impressed,

Cowen’s analyst Jeffrey Osborne expressed his reservations on Elon Musk’s ideas in a note on Tuesday, describing Tesla’s plans for its Robotaxi service as “half-baked.” The analyst also expressed his skepticism of Tesla’s capability to compete with established companies such as NVIDIA for hardware and Google for software. “We see a significant amount of technology and execution risk in the shift in strategy from competing in just electrification to Tesla also beating Nvidia in hardware, Google in software, and building a better ride-hailing service than current ride-hailing leaders. The Tesla Network Robotaxi plans seemed half-baked, with the company appearing to either not have answers to or not even considered pretty basic question on the pricing, insurance liability, or regulatory and legal requirements,” Osborne wrote.

SunTrust analyst Willian Stein was equally skeptical, though he did state that Tesla’s Robotaxi business could be financially compelling if the electric car maker successfully rolls out the service. “We are concurrently skeptical and hopeful about TSLA’s claims. If TSLA executes to plan, implications across semis/components are meaningful: positive for analog/mixed-signal vendors, mixed for digital vendors, negative for LiDAR vendors. Investors should recognize that, if the company achieves its autonomous driving goals, combining this with its already-achieved EV technology conspire to establish a ride-hailing service that could be quite financially compelling to both the car owner and the rider,” he stated.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas admitted that Tesla’s presentation of its full self-driving technology was impressive, though he also noted that Elon Musk’s idea of completely removing the driver (signified by the removal of the steering wheel and pedals on vehicles) could take a very long time. “Tesla’s autonomy investor presentations conveyed impressive technological leadership but, in our view, left big questions around time-to-market and did not change our views on the impediments to removing the human driver in a commercial service at scale. Attention returns to a challenging 1Q. More data to back up safety claims is needed. We still think removing the safety driver will take many years (if not decades) to achieve at high scale,” he wrote.

Not everyone was highly skeptical of Elon Musk’s vision for a Robotaxi service. Loup Ventures managing partner Gene Munster noted that Tesla’s non-LiDAR approach to full self-driving could very well give Tesla a headstart over other companies pursuing autonomous driving technology. “We are more comfortable with Tesla’s camera-based (non-LiDAR) approach to autonomy. If correct, this approach could actually be preferred (safer, more reliable, efficient, better design) and afford Tesla a several-years headstart as other players unwind LiDAR from their solution,” he wrote in a blog post after attending Tesla’s Autonomy Day.

According to Munster, Elon Musk also estimated that Tesla could operate up to 10 million Robotaxis in about 10 years. With an estimated gross profit of $30,000 per car annually (and taking Elon Musk’s estimates at face value), Tesla could be looking at over $300 billion in gross profit in 10 years. That’s a huge opportunity for Tesla, and it could very well make the electric car maker as one of the most valuable companies in the world. Nevertheless, the Loup Ventures partner noted that “given investor optimism on the autonomy theme, we believe this is the right time for Tesla to raise money (debt or equity) to de-risk the story with additional working capital.”

As of writing, Tesla shares are down 0.28% at $262.01 per share.

Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of TSLA and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.

Tesla (TSLA) dips as Elon Musk’s Robotaxi service meets skepticism from Wall St.


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla (TSLA) dips as Elon Musk’s Robotaxi service meets skepticism from Wall St.»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-tsla-network-robotaxi-elon-musk-wall-st/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-102122»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla’s Autonomy Day highlights Elon Musk’s vision for a full self-driving future without LiDAR


Elon Musk did not mince his words when he was asked about LiDAR during Tesla’s recently-held Autonomy Day, an event that featured a deep dive into the company’s full self-driving strategies and initiatives. Ever the bold CEO, Musk noted that LiDAR is unnecessary for vehicles to achieve autonomous driving capabilities.

“LiDAR is a fool’s errand, and anyone who relies on LiDAR is doomed. It’s like having expensive appendices. You’ll see,” Musk said.

Sr. Director of AI Andrej Karpathy elaborated on Elon Musk’s point during his presentation on Tesla’s neural network, stating that Tesla Vision and artificial intelligence are more than enough to perform actions that LiDAR can do. Describing his point, Karpathy lightly joked that the attendees of the event only used their biological neural networks to get to Autonomy Day’s venue without any issues.

“You all used your own neural network in your brains to get here. You didn’t shoot lasers from your eyes to drive,” Karpathy lightly said.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

LiDAR is used primarily by most key players in the autonomous driving market. Waymo and GM Cruise, the top two companies pursuing the technology according to research firm Navigant (the firm also lists Tesla as the second-worst company in terms of full self-driving), rely heavily on LiDAR for their autonomous vehicles’ operations. The technology is seeing a lot of support as well, with a Reuters analysis pointing to more than $1 billion in corporate and private investment being plowed into some 50 LiDAR startups in the past three years.

Nevertheless, Tesla is not the only company that is opting out of LiDAR for autonomous driving. Early this month, full self-driving startup Wayve showcased an impressive autonomous driving demonstration using a modified Renault Twizy. Similar to Tesla, Wayve accomplished its feat without using LiDAR. In a statement to Engadget, the self-driving startup noted that its full self-driving technology was made possible by using cameras and teaching AI to drive like a human being.

It should be noted that while Elon Musk has not minced words when it comes to his opinions about LiDAR, he is not completely against the technology. Musk described how SpaceX’s Dragon capsule uses LiDAR because it makes sense in that scenario. But when it comes to everyday driving, Musk was clear on his stance, even predicting that Tesla’s competitors in the full self-driving field will likely abandon LiDAR in due time. “They’re gonna dump LiDAR, mark my words. That’s my prediction. LiDAR in cars is stupid,” Musk said.

Tesla is yet to roll out the full capabilities of its Full Self-Driving suite to its fleet, though Musk has stated that he expects the system to be “feature complete” by the end of the year. Industry leaders such as Waymo are pretty much on the same boat, with most of the companies’ autonomous vehicles still requiring safety drivers as they operate in tightly geofenced areas. Considering Musk’s timeline for the rollout of Tesla’s full self-driving features, and taking into account the potential delays on its rollout, there is a good chance that the LiDAR debate might not be settled for some time to come.

Tesla’s Autonomy Day highlights Elon Musk’s vision for a full self-driving future without LiDAR


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla’s Autonomy Day highlights Elon Musk’s vision for a full self-driving future without LiDAR»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-elon-musk-full-self-driving-autonomy-day-lidar/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-102102»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla’s next-gen Roadster seen using a finger swipe feature as a door handle


Tesla’s next-generation Roadster uses a fingerprint swipe in lieu of a handle to open its doors, as demonstrated in a video captured by an attendee of Tesla’s Autonomy Day event. Hamid Shojaee revealed that a finger swipe down the very bottom of the B pillar of the car opens the Roadster door. Three horizontal LEDs were also seen blinking to acknowledge the swipe command prior to the release of the door latch.

Further details about the door feature were not provided in the video, but given the level of tech already present in the Roadster, it’s plausible the locking mechanism could be configured to rely on fingerprint data for validation rather than Bluetooth connection or key fob as used in the Model S, Model X, and Model 3. Owners with smartphones already equipped with biometric data readers might be able to sync their devices’ security features as an option if not already built into the native Tesla app. Alternatively, the swipe function could merely replace the door handles to maximize airflow around the vehicle and reduce the coefficient of drag as much as possible.

The Tesla next-gen Roadster was seen with finger swipe door handle entry. | Image: Hamid Shojaee/Twitter
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Along with the finger swipe feature, the Roadster video gives a quick tour of the car’s interior. The vehicle’s small but ergonomic steering wheel sits alone and centered in front of the driver’s seat, and no other distractions along the dash are seen aside from the vertically positioned touchscreen in the center console. A quick glimpse of the back seats is also given, showing off the surprising amount of room available

Not limited to onboard rocket thrusters as part of Tesla’s SpaceX Package, the next-generation Roadster will likely have several more unique features included that will be revealed as it gets closer to its anticipated 2020 first delivery date. The specs touted already are impressive in their own right, 0-60 mph in 1.9 seconds, 250+ mph top speed, and 620 miles of battery range, all for the bang-for-your-buck base price of $200,000. Tesla recently teased the supercar’s acceleration in a video tweet, stating the Roadster could do “Zero to sixty faster than you can read this caption.

The Investor Autonomy Day presentation touted Tesla’s Full Self-Driving computer as being the best in the world, and the next-generation Roadster will have its own specialized feature enabled by the autonomous software. In a tweet response inquiring about the Roadster’s Autopilot capabilities, CEO Elon Musk described the feature: “Definitely. Will also have Augmented Mode that will massively enhance human driving ability. Like a flying metal suit, but in car form …,” he said, referencing Marvel’s Iron Man and Tony Stark. The new Roadster is also said to have an optional SpaceX package which will enable it to hover similar to the DeLorean of Back to the Future fame.

Tesla’s next-gen Roadster seen using a finger swipe feature as a door handle


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla’s next-gen Roadster seen using a finger swipe feature as a door handle»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-roadster-door-handle-finger-swipe-pillar/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-102077»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla’s self-driving future to take center stage at Autonomy Day: What to expect


Tesla’s Autonomy Day is starting in a few hours, and the anticipation among the electric car community is reaching a fever pitch. Elon Musk has promoted Autonomy Day over the past week, even lightly hinting that the event will “free investors from the tyranny of having to drive their own car.”

Tesla’s noted in its initial announcement that it will be providing investors a deep dive into its full self-driving initiatives. Several key Tesla executives involved in the development of the company’s full self-driving technology are expected to address investors at the event, including VP of Engineering Stuart Bowers, VP of Hardware Engineering Pete Bannon, and Sr. Director of AI Andrej Karpathy. More importantly, test drives on vehicles that are equipped with yet-to-be-released Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features are also expected to be conducted.

Apart from this information, Tesla has managed to keep the specifics of its upcoming autonomy event secret. With this in mind, here are some developments and features that we expect Tesla to showcase in Autonomy Day.

Summon and Navigate on Autopilot Improvements

When Tesla brought back Full Self-Driving as an add-on for its electric cars, the company placed Navigate on Autopilot and Summon, two features that were previously part of Enhanced Autopilot, as part of the FSD suite. Tesla has since improved the features, with Enhanced Summon allowing vehicles to navigate a parking lot to find their owners, and Navigate on Autopilot being capable of changing lanes without any turn stalk confirmation. These features are still being improved by Tesla, and it would not be surprising if the company decides to showcase improved capabilities of Summon and NoA to investors on Autonomy Day.

(Photo: Melinda VerMeer/YouTube)
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Traffic Light/Stop Sign response and automatic city streets driving

A look at Tesla’s order page for the Model S, Model 3, and Model X shows that Full Self-Driving has two capabilities marked for release “later this year.” These are “Recognize and respond to traffic lights and stop signs” and “Automatic driving on city streets.” Both these features require Tesla’s neural net to be trained enough to recognize visual input at a level that is quite close to that of a human driver. Tesla appears to be taking steps towards this goal, as indicated by findings from hacker-enthusiast greentheonly, who found what appears to be stop line detection features in 2019.4. Tesla’s recent Autosteer Stop Light Warning, which prompts drivers to take over the vehicle’s controls if a red light is detected, also appears to be a step towards automatic city driving.

Back in the third quarter earnings call, Director of AI Andrej Karpathy noted that while Tesla had already trained larger, more advanced neural networks that work very well, the company is unable to deploy it to the fleet due to the limitations of its hardware. “We are currently at a place where we’ve trained large Neural Networks that work very well, but we are not able to deploy them to the fleet due to computational constraints,” he said. These limitations are expected to be rendered null and void by Tesla’s Hardware 3, which is also expected to be discussed on Autonomy Day.

New mobile app features

 

At the core of the Tesla experience is its mobile app. It allows customers to view the status of their vehicles, and as shown in videos from members of Tesla’s early access program, it is also a central part of Summon’s more advanced features. A Teslarati reader who is part of the early access program recently sent new screenshots of updates in the mobile app (3.8.3), such as Roadside Assistance as well, which allows owners to call the company for aid in the event of a flat tire, or similar emergencies.

Tesla Network test drives

Tesla’s endgame with its full self-driving feature is the Tesla Network, a ride-hailing service that utilizes a fleet of autonomous vehicles. Back in the Q3 2018 earnings call, Musk noted the Tesla Network will be competing with giants such as Uber and Lyft. The company made its intentions for the Tesla Network even clearer when it released leasing options for the Model 3. In its announcement, Tesla stated that customers cannot purchase their leased vehicles after their lease period is over since the company will be using the electric cars for the Tesla Network. With Tesla expected to showcase its full self-driving features in Autonomy Day, it will not be surprising if the company provides a teaser of what it’s like to experience the Tesla Network firsthand. 

An emphasis on human vigilance

While Autonomy Day will be focused on the company’s full self-driving features, Tesla will likely continue to emphasize that its vehicles and their driver-assist features still require constant attention on the road in the near future. This is something that Elon Musk has teased previously at an appearance in ARK Invest’s For Your Innovation podcast when he described how Tesla’s full self-driving features will be feature-complete. “I think we will be feature complete — full self-driving — this year. I would say I am certain of that. That is not a question mark. However, people sometimes will extrapolate that to mean now it works with 100 percent certainty, requires no observation, perfectly. This is not the case,” Musk said. Thus, for the following years, at least, Tesla will likely focus on Level 4 autonomous solutions, which are capable of operating a vehicle without human input but are equipped with pedals and controls for manual overrides just the same.

Tesla’s Autonomy Day will be livestreamed by the company.

Tesla’s self-driving future to take center stage at Autonomy Day: What to expect


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla’s self-driving future to take center stage at Autonomy Day: What to expect»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-self-driving-autonomy-day-what-to-expect/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-101942»;

Comments
Teilen:

10 things Tesla (TSLA) retail investors want to know from Q1 2019 earnings call


Tesla’s retail investors are aggregating a number of inquiries that will hopefully be addressed in the upcoming Q1 2019 earnings call. The questions are aggregated from verified TSLA investors by Say, a startup that aims to create and develop investor communication tools.

Using the platform, Tesla investors have been submitting and voting on inquiries they wish to be discussed and clarified by the electric car maker. The crowdsourced initiative has garnered quite a lot of support from the TSLA investor community, with over 340 retail shareholders representing around $30 million worth of stock posting their inquiries on the platform.

Here are 10 questions that garnered the most votes from the company’s retail shareholders.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
  1. Will Tesla be able to complete their purchase of Maxwell Technologies? What is holding that back?
  2. Last earnings call, Tesla emphasized the prioritization of improving customer service in Q1. It appears that significant improvements have been made. Can you share some key performance metrics around improving customer service?
  3. Can we expect the pace of pricing changes to continue? Can you elaborate on the price hike trajectory of the Full-Self Driving option beginning May 1st?
  4. Elon, most people when they think of Tesla only see it as an automotive company. Can you speak to Energy side of the company, specifically the road map for when you see the energy side of things really taking off and generating major revenue for the company? Thanks.
  5. When and where will the Tesla Semi begin production?
  6. When do you expect Powerwall and Powerpack production to meet current orders? What about the solar roof tiles?
  7. Is Tesla considering creating an insurance program in order to further simplify the ownership experience and to more accurately take into account the safety of driving on autopilot? The insurance market is very unreliable for Tesla owners right now.
  8. Do you have an updated timeline for the Tesla Pickup Truck reveal?
  9. Elon, if you were to ask Andrej Karpathy when he believes Tesla will be technically capable of Level 5 autonomy, when would Andrej estimate Level 5 or Full-Self Driving will be technically complete? (not released to customers, nor having received regulatory approval)
  10. Are you still confident you will be profitable in Q2 and Q3?

Tesla is yet to fully confirm if it will be entertaining questions from its retail investors in its earnings call, though the company has been open to the idea in the past. In the Q2 2018 earnings call, retail investors representing $60 million worth of TSLA shares listed down 305 questions for the company, and five were personally answered by Elon Musk during the Q&A session.

Tesla is quite unique in the way that it is willing to democratize its process of communicating its earnings to shareholders and its institutional investors. Such a strategy is unusual, and is yet another step away from convention, especially since traditional earnings calls primarily feature questions from Wall Street analysts and the occasional member of the media. If Tesla includes crowdsourced questions in its Q1 2019 earnings call, the electric car maker will be ensuring once more that inquiries which are most relevant and pertinent to retail investors are addressed.

Tesla’s Q1 2019 earnings call is expected to be held on Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at  2:30 p.m. Pacific Time (5:30 p.m. Eastern Time).

The full list of questions from TSLA’s retail investors listed on Say could be accessed here.

10 things Tesla (TSLA) retail investors want to know from Q1 2019 earnings call


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «10 things Tesla (TSLA) retail investors want to know from Q1 2019 earnings call»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-tsla-retail-investors-q1-2019-earnings-call/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-101933»;

Comments
Teilen:

Tesla bears start GoFundMe page for TSLA short accused of harassing Fremont workers


One of Tesla’s fiercest critics who was reportedly forced to cease his online initiatives against the company has returned to start a GoFundMe page for another TSLA bear, who was recently issued a temporary restraining order for stalking, harassing, and endangering a group of employees from the Fremont factory. The fundraiser has been successful so far, with 373 people raising over $81,000 in just one day.

On Friday, the Alameda County Superior Court in CA granted a temporary restraining order against Randeep Hothi, the man behind @skabooshka, a prominent anti-Tesla account on Twitter. Tesla accused Hothi of committing several offenses against the company, including injuring a member of its security personnel, and later, and harassing a group of employees who were filming a demonstration of Navigate on Autopilot in a company-owned Model 3. The temporary restraining order is effective until May 7, when a hearing is set for the noted TSLA bear.

With Hothi’s hearing approaching, the TSLAQ community (a group of individuals aiming for Tesla to fall) has mobilized to raise funds for their fellow detractor. The GoFundMe page was started by Lawrence Fossi, a fierce Tesla critic who wrote and tweeted under the pseudonym Montana Skeptic. Fossi was one of the TSLAQ community’s most active members, at least until he was reportedly forced to cease his online activities after Elon Musk contacted his boss to complain about his actions. Fossi described the goal of the GoFundMe page for Hothi as follows.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am Lawrence J. Fossi and wrote at Seeking Alpha under the pseudonym of Montana Skeptic. I learned today that Tesla Inc. has obtained an ex parte (only one side represented) temporary restraining order against $TSLAQ member @skabooshka.

What will follow over the next two weeks or so is “discovery” (depositions, written questions) and an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Tesla can obtain a temporary injunction. Tesla alleges @skabooshka is a dangerous person. I believe he is a seeker of truth who has done valuable work and deserves a vigorous and capable defense.

Tesla’s TRO application was triggered by @skabooshka’s effort to determine the true nature of the forthcoming “Investor Autonomy Event”. I believe important First Amendment rights are at issue, and urge you to support his effort.

Funds will be used to pay @skabooshka’s legal expenses in defending against the Tesla legal action, and in bringing any appropriate counterclaims. Any and all excess funds will be donated to a good related cause, with full disclosure about the recipient or recipients, and proof of donation sent to all donors. Many thanks.

Some known TSLAQ members pitching in for their fellow Tesla detractor. (Credit: GoFundMe)

Hothi has received an outpouring of support from the Tesla bear community. A look through the donations given to the fundraiser so far shows several known Tesla shorts, including Stanphyl Capital’s Mark Spiegel (who is tapped at times as a source for TSLA insights by mainstream media), @TeslaCharts, and Fossi himself donating significant amounts. In an update to the fundraiser, Fossi pledged that the money raised through the GoFundMe page will strictly be used for Hothi’s legal needs.

While the response to Hothi’s GoFundMe page is quite impressive, it should be noted that Tesla only filed a restraining order against the Tesla bear after he reportedly endangered the lives of three Tesla employees. On April 16, three employees were filming in a Model 3 when Hothi reportedly stalked and harassed them. So aggressive were Hothi’s actions that the Model 3’s crash avoidance systems were activated. Fearing for their safety, one of the Tesla employees in the vehicle promptly called the police to report the incident.

According to Tesla, the April incident was not the first time that Hothi committed acts against the company. Back in February, the TSLA short reportedly struck a security employee with his car when the latter was about to give him a verbal warning for trespassing into the Fremont factory’s grounds. The matter was also reported to the police, who attempted to issue a warning notice of trespass. Unfortunately, the warning was never given since Hothi proved uncooperative in meeting with Fremont police officers.

Tesla bears start GoFundMe page for TSLA short accused of harassing Fremont workers


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «Tesla bears start GoFundMe page for TSLA short accused of harassing Fremont workers»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-tsla-bears-gofundme-page-restraining-order/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-101874»;

Comments
Teilen:

SpaceX’s Crew Dragon suffers catastrophic explosion during static fire test


Six weeks after the spacecraft completed its orbital launch debut, SpaceX’s first flight-proven Crew Dragon capsule suffered a catastrophic explosion seconds before a planned SuperDraco test fire.

In the last nine years, SpaceX has successfully built, tested, launched, and recovered Cargo and Crew Dragons 18 times, including five instances of Cargo Dragon capsule reuse, all with minor or no issues. The April 20th event is the first time in the known history of SpaceX’s orbital spacecraft program that a vehicle – in this case, the first completed and flight-proven Crew Dragon capsule – has suffered a total failure. Regardless of the accident investigation’s ultimate conclusions, the road ahead of Crew Dragon’s first crewed test flight has become far more arduous.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

According to information acquired by NASASpaceflight.com, SpaceX was in the middle of a series of static fire tests meant to verify that the flight-proven capsule was in good working order after Crew Dragon’s inaugural mission to orbit. The spacecraft was to be tested near SpaceX’s Cape Canaveral Landing Zone facilities, where the company has a small but dedicated space for Dragon tests. Crew Dragon C201’s testing began earlier on Saturday, successfully firing up its smaller Draco maneuvering thrusters. This transitioned into a planned SuperDraco ignition, what would have been the first such integrated test fire for capsule C201.

SpaceX planned to rapidly reuse Crew Dragon C201 for an upcoming in-flight abort (IFA) test, in which the spacecraft would be required to successfully escape from Falcon 9 at the point of peak aerodynamic stress (Max Q). Based on a leaked video of the failure, one or several faults in Crew Dragon’s design and/or build led to a near-instantaneous explosion that destroyed the spacecraft. Sound in the background seems to indicate that the explosion occurred several seconds before the planned SuperDraco ignition, a major concern given their pressure-fed design.

As pressure-fed rocket engines specifically designed to be the basis of a launch escape system, Crew Dragon and its SuperDraco thrusters are meant to be ready to ignite at a millisecond’s notice once they are armed in a flight-ready configuration. It’s safe to say that ten seconds away from a specifically planned ignition is one of those moments, although there is a limited chance that SpaceX’s static fire procedures intentionally diverge from an abort-triggered ignition. Regardless, the fact that Crew Dragon was destroyed before the ignition of its SuperDracos is not an encouraging sign.

Instead of a problem with its high-performance abort thrusters, it can be tentatively concluded that Crew Dragon’s explosion originated in its fuel tanks or propellant plumbing. Such an immediate and energetic explosion points more towards a total failure of propellant lines or valves (or their avionics), while another – and potentially far more concerning – cause could be one of Crew Dragon’s pressure vessels. In a space as enclosed as a Dragon capsule, the rupture of a pressure vessel could trigger a chain reaction of pressure vessel failures, freeing both oxidizer (NTO) and fuel (MMH). Known as hypergolic propellant, NTO and MMH ignite immediately (and violently so) when mixed.

It’s quite possible that the accident investigation to follow will be SpaceX’s most difficult and trying yet. Regardless of the specific cause, the footage of Crew Dragon C201’s demise does not support any positive conclusions about the fate of astronauts or passengers, had they been aboard during the violent explosion. Seemingly triggered in some way by the very system meant to safely extricate Crew Dragon and its astronauts from a failing Falcon 9 rocket, major work will need to be done to prove to NASA that the spacecraft is safe. Sadly, Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft – funded in parallel with Crew Dragon under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program – suffered a far less severe but no less significant failure during a static fire test of its own abort thrusters. Boeing was forced to remove the impacted hardware from its flight plans to extensively clean, repair, and rework the service module.

NASA is now faced with the fact that both of the spacecraft it supported with CCP have exhibited major failures related to their launch escape systems. Crew Dragon’s catastrophic explosion comes as a particularly extreme surprise given how extensively SpaceX has already tested the SuperDraco engines and plumbing, as well as the successful completion of the spacecraft’s launch debut. In the process of DM-1 launch preparations, Crew Dragon likely spent a minimum of 80 minutes with its SuperDraco thrusters and propellant systems primed and ready to abort at any second, apparently without a single mildly-concerning issue.

Godspeed to SpaceX and NASA as they enter into this challenging and unplanned failure investigation.

Check out Teslarati’s newsletters for prompt updates, on-the-ground perspectives, and unique glimpses of SpaceX’s rocket launch and recovery processes

SpaceX’s Crew Dragon suffers catastrophic explosion during static fire test


<!–

View Comments

–>

var disqus_shortname = «teslarati»;
var disqus_title = «SpaceX’s Crew Dragon suffers catastrophic explosion during static fire test»;
var disqus_url = «https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-crew-dragon-explosion/»;
var disqus_identifier = «teslarati-101560»;

Comments
Teilen: