LNG: TESLARATI

On its fifth launch of 2020, SpaceX has nailed its 50th Falcon rocket booster landing and sent Cargo Dragon (Dragon 1) en route to the International Space Station (ISS) on its final mission, paving the way for Crew Dragon’s imminent takeover.

At 11:50 pm EST (4:50 UTC), a flight-proven Falcon 9 booster and twice-flown Cargo Dragon spacecraft lifted off from SpaceX’s LC-40 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) launch pad, sending the Dragon 1 spacecraft on its third and final orbital launch. Things went as planned and the booster nailed its second landing, coming to a rest at Landing Zone-1 (LZ-1), while Falcon 9’s second stage successfully placed Dragon in orbit and deployed the vehicle. Now safely in orbit with both solar arrays deployed, Cargo Dragon will use built-in maneuvering thrusters to tweak its orbit, ultimately rendezvousing with space station no earlier than the morning (EDT) of March 9th.

Hopefully wrapping up a decade of success, the CRS-20 mission will be SpaceX’s last under NASA’s Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) Phase 1 contract, marking Cargo Dragon’s 20th successful space station rendezvous and 19th operational resupply mission. Over those 19 CRS missions, SpaceX – once CRS-20 has safely berthed – will have delivered nearly 45 metric tons (100,000 lb) of cargo to the space station and returned another 31 metric tons (>70,000 lb) to Earth, remaining the only operational spacecraft capable of doing so. While Dragon 1 will cease operations after capsule C112’s planned reentry and splashdown sometime next month, the vast wealth of expertise SpaceX has derived has already been funneled directly into Crew Dragon (Dragon 2), its successor.

Carrying about 2050 kg (4500 lb) of cargo, Cargo Dragon capsule C112 and its expendable trunk section will spend about a month in orbit after berthing with the space station this Monday. The mission may be the last time in history a SpaceX spacecraft berths with the International Space Station, a process that the Dragon 2 spacecraft will soon replace outright once it takes over. Instead of berthing, which refers to the process of astronauts manually ‘grappling’ a visiting vehicle with the space station’s massive robotic arm, SpaceX’s next-generation spacecraft relies on docking, meaning that it does all the work itself.

Docking is thus somewhat riskier and more technically challenging, but it also requires far less input from the station’s crew and can be done almost entirely autonomously, further simplifying the rendezvous process. Once it gets to that point, SpaceX’s massive Starship spacecraft will likely rely on the same docking technology if or when it comes time for it to mate with the ISS – the vehicle is simply too big for anything else.

A slightly tweaked version of Crew Dragon, SpaceX’s future Cargo Dragon 2 spacecraft will replace its human passengers with the same supplies Cargo Dragon currently ferries to and from the ISS. According to Vice President of Build and Build Reliability Hans Koenigsmann, SpaceX has already begun building its first Cargo Dragon 2 spacecraft back at its Hawthorne, California headquarters. That vehicle’s launch debut is scheduled no earlier than (NET) “fall” 2020 and will support CRS-21, SpaceX’s first NASA resupply mission under its CRS Phase 2 contract.

Cargo Dragon 2’s “launch debut” should thankfully be quite the non-event. Crew Dragon – nearly identical – will have hopefully flown at least two (and perhaps three) orbital missions to the space station by then, dramatically reducing risk. The spacecraft will also use Falcon 9, currently classed as one of the world’s most reliable launch vehicles. CRS-20 marked the rocket’s 54th consecutively successful launch, as well as SpaceX’s 50th successful booster landing since December 2015.

For now, though, Cargo Dragon C112 still needs to make its way uphill to rendezvous with the ISS for the final time. Stay tuned for updates on the spacecraft’s last orbital mission.

Check out Teslarati’s newsletters for prompt updates, on-the-ground perspectives, and unique glimpses of SpaceX’s rocket launch and recovery processes.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla Model Y VINs are being released to the first batch of production cars ahead of next week’s customer deliveries.

Tesla Model Y buyers in the US, including those in New York, Florida, Georgia, California, and beyond, are finding references to their vehicle’s identification number, otherwise known as a “VIN”, in their vehicle’s online purchase agreement. TMC user johnmodely, on the other hand, was able to find their Model Y VIN after viewing the source code for their Tesla Account page. Teslarati has also confirmed with a Model Y reservation holder in Southern California that a VIN has, in fact, been assigned to their vehicle.

This isn’t the first time we’re hearing of Tesla Model Y VIN numbers being uncovered. Earlier this year, a  batch of Model Y VIN registrations were spotted in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database, during which time the Elon Musk-led electric carmaker was preparing for the first production units from its Fremont factory in California. Now, two months later, the first set of Model Y VINs are being shared by their owners on the Tesla Motors Club (TMC) forum, giving a first look at the Model Y configurations being prioritized for delivery.

The discovery also comes days after a trailer full of Model Y was spotted outside of Tesla’s Fremont factory, presumably on their way to delivery centers across the nation. Just yesterday, images of Model Y were uncovered in Tesla’s latest mobile app update, further validating that the company was preparing for the imminent arrival of their first all-electric crossover.

Tesla’s release of Model Y VINs to buyers is part of the final process before a customer takes delivery.

Taking a closer look at the vehicle identification number, we can learn more information about the Model Y including its motor configuration, the year in which the vehicle was produced, and also the location for production.

Tesla Model Y VIN Decoder

All Model S, Model X, Model 3, and Model Y can be identified by the “5YJ” that’s set in the first three characters of the vehicle’s VIN. The three digits represents what’s referred to as the World Manufacturer Identifier (WMI) and uniquely identifies the manufacturer of the vehicle.

• Digits 1 – 3: World Manufacturing Identifier
  • 5YJ = Manufacturer: Tesla Inc.
• Digit 4: Make/Line/Series
  • S = Tesla Model S
  • 3 = Tesla Model 3
  • X = Tesla Model X
  • Y = Tesla Model Y
• Digit 5: Body Type and Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR)
  • A – Hatch back 5 Dr/ LHD
  • C = Class E (6001-7000 lbs) GVWR / MPV / 5 Dr / LHD
  • E = Sedan 4 Dr / LHD
  • F = Sedan 4 Dr / RHD
  • G = Sport Utility Vehicle (5,001 – 6,000 lb) GVWR /Multi-Purpose Vehicle (MPV)  of 1D: .
• Digit 6: Restraint System
  • 1= Type 2 manual seatbelts (FR, SR*3) with front airbags, PODS, side inflatable restraints, knee airbags (FR)
  • A = Type 2 manual seatbelts (FR, SR*3, TR*2) with front airbags, PODS, side inflatable restraints, knee airbags (FR)
  • B = Type 2 manual seatbelts (FR, SR*2, TR*2) with front airbags, PODS, side inflatable restraints, knee airbags (FR)
  • D= Type 2 Manual seatbelts (FR, SR*3) with front airbags. PODS, side inflatable restraints, knee airbags (FR)
• Digit 7: Fuel Type
  • E = Electric
• Digit 8: Motor/Drive Unit
  • 1= Single Motor – Standard
  • 3= Single Motor – Performance
  • 2 = Dual Motor (Standard)
  • 4 = Dual Motor (Performance)
  • A = Single Motor – Standard
  • B = Dual Motor – Standard
  • F = Dual Motor – Performance
• Digit 9: Check Digit To be assigned by manufacturer pursuant to 49 CFR § 565.6(c)
• Digit 10: Model Year
  • C = 2012
  • D = 2013
  • E = 2014
  • F = 2015
  • G = 2016
  • H = 2017
  • J = 2018
  • K = 2019
  • L = 2020
• Digit 11: Plant of Manufacture
  • F = Fremont, CA
• Digits 12: Production Series:
  • A = Alpha Prototype
  • B = Beta Prototype
  • R = Release Candidate Vehicle
  • P = Production Vehicle
  • S = Signature Series Vehicle
  • F = Founder Series Vehicle
  • 0-9 = Production Vehicle (replaces P to allow 6 digit sequence numbers)
• Digits 13-17: Unique serial number

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

‘General Motors has announced its plans to begin manufacturing electric vehicles at scale. To make its $20 billion plan a reality, it has to do one thing: Acknowledge that its alignment with President Donald Trump’s emissions rollback efforts is a lost cause. This is because creating electric vehicles and abiding by an environmentally-harming plan go together like oil and water.

When GM decided that it would follow along with President Trump’s auto emissions rollback efforts and not with California’s Clean Air Act, the state made the decision to halt the purchase of vehicles from the automaker. But on March 4, GM held its first “EV Day” where it outlined an ambitious plan to dive into and saturate the EV sector, making it evident the company is ready to make a serious push towards the adoption of sustainable vehicles.

GM has said to customers for years that it will pursue a future that promotes environmental longevity. However, the company’s decision to not abide by California’s environmental plan seems to show it has not been completely dedicated to ideas that could help the Earth.

To make its push toward electric vehicles and sustainability a reality, GM has to begin by abandoning Trump’s emissions rollback efforts that would lower the average fuel efficiency requirements of vehicles. If successful, the government’s initiative could result in automakers rolling out gas-guzzling vehicles once more, similar to the rise of SUVs following the death of the EV1, GM’s electric car.

The Trump administration’s plan is expected to hike oil consumption in the United States by half a billion barrels a day, but it could also reduce automakers regulatory costs by more than $300 billion annually, according to Reuters. This would put more money in the carmaker’s pockets, but more carbon dioxide into the air.

While GM is not the only automaker to side with the Trump rollback efforts, it is the only one that is making a big push toward an electric lineup. When asked to comment, the company said, “Regardless of the standards, we are committed to a future of zero crashes, zero emissions, and zero congestion. The pathway to that future includes continually improving fuel economy year-over-year and our commitment to an all-electric future.”

This year, GM resurrected of the Hummer, but this time around, the vehicle will be all-electric and won’t boast the same devil-may-care fuel consumption that its gas-powered predecessors did. While GM has notable EVs like the Chevy Bolt, the automaker’s plans for the release of an electric lineup of vehicles must still coincide with the company’s larger goals.

Volkswagen, Ford, BMW, and Honda have all committed to increases in fuel economy year-over-year. GM can become the next automaker to adopt this pledge, but it must first take a strong stance against the administration’s emissions rollback efforts. If GM cannot do this, then its $20 billion electric vehicle plan may end up being just that — a plan, and very little else.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As Tesla continues to rise in Europe with the construction of Giga Berlin and the impending local prduction of the Model Y, Volkswagen’s controlling family issued a rare statement of support for CEO Herbert Diess’ aggressive and somewhat controversial electric car push. In a recent statement to local German media, the Porsche-Piech family stated that they are fully backing the CEO in these trying times, as a painful shift to electric cars may be what is required to keep Volkswagen thriving in the coming EV age. 

Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess is a staunch proponent of electric cars, with the company’s first all-electric vehicle, the ID.3, being his personal project. Diess’ dedication for electric cars has earned the respect of Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has expressed his support for the Volkswagen CEO’s efforts in the past. “Herbert Diess is doing more than any big carmaker to go electric. The good of the world should come first. For what it’s worth, he has my support,” Musk wrote. 

Unfortunately for Diess, his aggressive push for electrification has faced sharp criticism. These negative sentiments have only become more prominent as Volkswagen’s ID.3 ramp met roadblocks due to the vehicle’s software. Diess has predicted these challenges, stating that Volkswagen’s shift towards electric mobility is “perhaps the most difficult task VW has ever had to face.” Yet with investors reportedly growing restless, it appeared that the Porsches and Piëchs, Volkswagen’s controlling family, have deemed it pertinent to express their stance. 

In a statement to the BILD newspaper on Thursday, Supervisory Board member Hans-Michel Piëch stated that he fully supports Diess’ initiatives. “He has our support. He is faced with an enormous task. For this, he needs strength, but also support from everyone in the Group,” he said. Wolfgang Porsche, Piëch’s cousin, echoed his sentiments. “Even if Mr. Diess is criticized from many sides, he would be taking an insane risk: There is no alternative today to the path that he and the Volkswagen Board of Management have taken,” Porsche said. 

Apart from openly supporting Diess’ efforts, the VW majority shareholders explained why the company had gone all-in on electric cars. For example, Diess has taken a strong stance against hydrogen, opting instead to focus solely on electric vehicles. According to Piëch, this is a decision that he and his cousin fully support. “The discussion about a decision for hydrogen or batteries alone is unfortunate. Hydrogen is too expensive for the foreseeable future and simply cannot be produced with sustainable energy,” he said. 

Wolfgang Porsche, for his part, has stated that an intense focus on developing next-generation automotive solutions is needed to survive and thrive in the car industry of the future. Seemingly addressing Volkswagen’s current issues with the ID.3’s software, Porsche stated that it is better to tackle the growing pains of electrification now, instead of potentially facing a real risk in the future. “In the future, digitization and software will determine the car. You have to know: If we don’t tackle this transformation now, the company will have a huge problem in the future,” Porsche said. 

The coming years will likely be historic for the automotive industry as a whole. Young carmakers such as Tesla have established a hold in the mainstream market, with vehicles such as the Model 3 becoming a viable and even preferable alternative to conventional best-sellers like the BMW M3. With legacy carmakers now realizing the value of electric cars and the importance of battery tech and software, it is in the best interest of Volkswagen to ensure that it invests in the future today. For now, this would likely result in several painful transitions. But if Diess, Piëch, and Porsche’s statements are any indication, it appears that Volkswagen will be willing to take some heavy blows if it means securing a future where the company is still relevant and competitive. 

H/T Alex Voigt.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Tesla Model 3 has retained its stellar safety rating from the Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), earning the organization’s rare Top Safety Pick+ award for 2020. The announcement was shared by the electric car maker and the safety group on their official Twitter accounts.

Not a lot of vehicles receive the IIHS’ Top Safety Pick+ rating. To earn the award, vehicles must have “Good” scores in the driver-side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraint tests. “Good” ratings are also required for the vehicle’s headlights, a metric that is particularly challenging for many carmakers. Even the first iterations of the Tesla Model S and the Chevy Bolt, for example, were given a “Poor” rating by the agency since their headlights were so bright, they could blind other drivers.

Following perfect safety ratings from the NHTSA, Euro-NCAP, and ANCAP, the Tesla Model 3 was awarded by the IIHS with its Top Safety Pick+ award in September 2019. The award was a huge win for Tesla, proving once more that the Model 3 is among the safest cars on the road today. The IIHS’ recent announcement on its official Twitter account indicates that the Model 3’s 2020 iteration is as safe as ever.

The IIHS has noted that for its 2020 awards, only 64 vehicles qualified as the firm’s Top Safety Pick and Top Safety Pick+ list. Among the 64 vehicles that made it, only 23 qualified for the Top Safety Pick+ award, and one of these is the Tesla Model 3. IIHS President David Harkey explained that the relative rarity of vehicles with the “plus” rating is partly due to the firm’s strict headlight evaluation.

“The headlight ratings that have been part of our awards criteria in recent years have pushed automakers to pay more attention to this essential equipment. However, finding vehicles with the right headlights can be a challenge for consumers. We wanted to reward automakers that have removed this obstacle,” he said.

When the IIHS initially gave the Tesla Model 3 with its Top Safety Pick+ award, the firm explained that apart from its stellar crash ratings and bleeding-edge accident avoidance technology, the Model 3 shines due to its all-electric structural and powertrain design.

The absence of an internal combustion engine at the front of the Model 3, for example, gives the all-electric sedan extra-large crumple zones that help absorb impacts during crashes. Even the Model 3’s all-glass roof, apart from being visually stunning, proved helpful to the vehicle’s overall safety, resisting over 20,000 pounds of force.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla has made strides in terms of adjusting the timeline of Model Y deliveries. From Fall of 2020, Elon Musk and his team moved it up to Summer this year. During the company’s Q4 2019 earnings call, the carmaker announced that the initial delivery of the much-awaited electric crossover will actually happen this March. This says a lot on how the Silicon Valley-based carmaker has matured through the years.

Tesla began limited production of the Model Y at its Fremont factory and it has also started building the next phase of Giga Shanghai meant for the production of the crossover SUV. Giga Berlin would be the next big thing and with its learnings from the Model Y program in Fremont and Shanghai, the production of the Model Y in Germany may help Tesla redefine “Elon Time.”

Biggest Room For Improvement

Tesla is undeniably the leader in the electric vehicle industry. Even automotive giants have acknowledged that Tesla is the standard that they need to catch up to.

Tesla has great products and a CEO with great vision but if there’s one aspect of business all loyal followers would love to see, it’s in the timely delivery of its vehicles. Depending on how efficient ongoing production is and how many standing preorders are to be served, waiting times could be a few weeks, to a month, to a few months, or even a year or so for products that are yet to be produced. Delays, such as those experienced by reservation holders of the Model X, have even inspired the meme-worthy moniker of “Elon Time,” a reference to the CEO’s optimistic target timeframes.

Tesla’s logistics does not depend on any third-party franchise dealerships like other automakers but rather its own stores and delivery centers. Elon Musk has continually strived to improve delivery times and part of the strategy is by bringing Tesla’s car factories to its customers. Thus, Giga Shanghai is set to give a strong foothold in the biggest automotive market in the globe. Then, there’s Giga Berlin that would cater to Germany and the rest of Europe.

“It kind of makes sense. But what we’re doing — or have been doing in the past was really pretty silly in making cars in California and then shipping them halfway around the world to Asia and Europe. And this created a lot of cost, because you got to ship those cars, so they got lot of finished goods, sitting on the order or waiting at the port or going through customs, you got tariffs, transport,” said Musk. This also addresses the complexity of fulfilling the build according to the regulations of different regions.

Tesla’s Transformation as a Mature Car Manufacturer

The Tesla Giga Berlin groundbreaking is expected to happen this March and Elon Musk hopes to flick the switch on of the first Gigafactory in Europe by July 2021 to begin the production of the Model Y for Germany and the rest of Europe.

Tesla has proven itself capable of sticking to timelines when it comes to building its Gigafactories. For example, It practically turned a muddy field in China into an operational car factory in 10 months. In Germany, it has been cooperating with federal and local authorities and has addressed concerns of environmental groups to get closer and closer to laying the first brick of Giga Berlin in Grunheide.

The more interesting thing to take note of is how Tesla outlined its goals for Giga Berlin.

“Phase 1 will focus on production of Model Y, with a target capacity of 10,000 vehicles per week. We estimate that during Phase 1, we will employ up to 12,000 people, with roles being filled by local residents and employees from wider Europe,” the Giga Berlin website reads.

Manufacturing cars is far from making pancakes. Tesla’s Fremont factory has a current capacity of producing 400,000 combined Model 3 and Model Y units per year. Giga Shanghai, meanwhile, aims to do 150,000 vehicles annually. To do 10,000 units per week is a gargantuan task but realizing that Elon Musk has been underpromising and over-delivering when it comes to the Model Y, perhaps Tesla has indeed started using advanced manufacturing techniques that the CEO hinted at during a Model 3 event in Shanghai.

“Model Y will also have some advanced manufacturing technology that we will reveal in the future. I think it will be exciting to show the kind of manufacturing technology associated with the Model Y and it will be exciting to learn about these technologies,” Musk said.

No one exactly knows what these manufacturing technologies are but there are speculations that the Model Y will heavily rely on casting to quickly and efficiently produce the vehicle’s essential parts. This is also what’s suggested by earlier patents of the company.

The Model Y could be the first vehicle that demonstrates the company’s improving efficiency. It unveiled the Model Y prototype in March 2019 and it’s delivering the first units this month to consumers. This could partly be due to the Model Y sharing about 75% of its DNA with its Model 3 sibling, but it reflects Tesla’s manufacturing advancements nonetheless.

New Elon Time

If Giga Berlin remains on schedule and Tesla starts Model Y production in Germany, a country that highly values punctuality, on time, it could give its sales books a good boost as the vehicle is perfectly timed for Europe’s crossover growth. Sales of compact SUVs are forecasted to be flat this year with LCM Automotive predicting only about 2 million units in the segment as carmakers transition from older vehicles to electric vehicles. As Giga Berlin begins production of the Model Y, there is an expected uptick in demand with sales rising to 2.4 million units per year to about 2.8 million by the mid-2020s.

Beyond earnings,  the redefinition Elon Time by a timely Model Y production and delivery will help Tesla gain the respect of other car manufacturers, the market, and investors.  The new Elon Time would further prove why Tesla has the loyal following, and why it will be like that for a foreseeable future.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla Model Y images have been discovered in the latest version of the company’s Android mobile app.

Images of Model Y’s body, 19″ Gemini wheels with and without wheel covers, and an overhead view of the all-electric crossover’s expansive all-glass roof have been added to the latest version 3.10.4-396 Tesla Mobile app (for Android) ahead of customer deliveries.

Redditor matt687 who shared the latest findings to the Teslamotors subreddit, notes that they were able to discover the Model Y app resources after decompiling the Android package (APK) for the latest mobile app and compared it to a previous version of the app. Nothing stood out between the older and newer release of Tesla’s Android app, with features remaining the same, except the addition of the Model Y images.

Notable in the image showing the trunk of the Model Y is the appearance of a cargo shelf.

Tesla mobile app view Model Y body (Credit: matt687 via Reddit)

Tesla mobile app view Model Y body (Credit: matt687 via Reddit)

Tesla mobile app view Model Y glass roof (Credit: matt687 via Reddit)

Tesla mobile app view Model Y 19″ Gemini wheels with cover (Credit: matt687 via Reddit)

Tesla mobile app view Model Y 19″ Gemini wheels (Credit: matt687 via Reddit)

The latest finding makes sense from a timing perspective, especially as Tesla gears up to make its first Model Y customer deliveries beginning March 15.

The new app resources of Tesla Model Y suggests that owners will have the same mobile app functionality as made available for its entire fleet, including Model S, Model X, and Model 3. Tesla Model Y owners will have the ability to control in-cabin temperatures directly from the mobile app. Presumably, and unlike its closest sibling, Model 3, owners will also be able to control rear heated seats.

In addition, Tesla’s mobile app allows owners to open both front trunk (frunk) and rear trunk, remote start a vehicle with keyless driving, set maximum speed limits for the car, among other a host of other safety and convenience features like Smart Summon.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Earth has a new companion: a mini-moon called 2020 CD3. On Feb. 15, scientists discovered a small rocky chunk that was captured by our planet’s gravity. But don’t get too excited, because it’s likely only a temporary fixture.

Our planet has only one natural satellite, our moon, but for the last couple of years, there’s been another lurking out in space. Astronomers spotted what is likely a carbonaceous asteroid with the help of the Catalina Sky Survey. The mini-moon is between 6.2 and 11.5-feet (1.9 to 3.5-m) in diameter, and roughly the size of a car.

Typically, temporarily captured objects, like 2020 CD3, only hang around for a brief time (from a few months to a year or two) before they are flung back out into space, or in some cases, burn up in our planet’s atmosphere as they’re pulled in by Earth’s gravitational tug.  But according to astronomer’s, it’s been orbiting the Earth for up to three years now.

BIG NEWS (thread 1/3). Earth has a new temporarily captured object/Possible mini-moon called 2020 CD3. On the night of Feb. 15, my Catalina Sky Survey teammate Teddy Pruyne and I found a 20th magnitude object. Here are the discovery images. pic.twitter.com/zLkXyGAkZl

— Kacper Wierzchos (@WierzchosKacper) February 26, 2020

The celestial real estate encircling the Earth is pretty crowded, which is probably why we’ve just now noticed it. Asteroids — which are piles of planetary rubble, remnants left over from the birth of the solar system — are usually very small and dark, making them difficult to spot.

So, discovering 2020 CD3 is kind of a big deal. To date, there have been only a handful of proposed potential mini-moons with only one confirmed — an asteroid named 2006 RH120. The three-foot-wide space rock orbited the Earth for just over a year, from 2006-2007. 

“Out of 1 million known asteroids, this is just the second asteroid known to orbit Earth,” Kacper Wierzchos, the astronomer who detected the object, said on Twitter.

The existence of 2020 CD3 is an exciting discovery for a number of reasons, including providing the chance to study asteroids up close. Most asteroids orbit between Mars and Jupiter, in the main asteroid belt and it takes sending a spacecraft out into the solar system to study one of these celestial objects in detail.

2020 CD3 could provide astronomers with the chance to study asteroids in detail and better understand how they’re captured by planets. Unfortunately,  computer simulations indicate that the mini-moon could be back on a journey around the sun as early as April. That’s because it’s caught in a game of tug-of-war between the Earth and the moon.

Analysis of 2020 CD3’s orbital motion indicates it’s heavy for its size, which leads astronomers to believe it is in fact, an asteroid. But scientists will use the next few weeks to continue studying the enigmatic object in order to definitively determine whether it is indeed an asteroid or perhaps a rogue piece of space junk.

There’s no time to plan a mission to 2020 CD3, as the object is already growing fainter and fainter in images, but astronomers say it will likely be back in a few decades. With more advanced telescopes coming online in the near future, these types of sightings could become more and more common.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The Tesla Model 3’s success in the European market shocked the region’s biggest automakers, including Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz. This was despite successful car manufacturers practically writing off Tesla because of its cash flow, production inexperience, and negative outlooks from several hedge funds.

As it turned out, the problem with dismissing Tesla as “the next big thing” is because the Silicon Valley-bred company, through its innovative and unique vehicles, has truly become the hottest company in the car industry. The Model 3 is a big part of that because of its affordability, dispelling the idea that electric cars with sufficient range and high performance are not mainstream cars.

The Model 3’s popularity in Europe was proven after a successful 2019. In December only the Volkswagen Golf and Renault Clio had higher sales figures. This is according to JATO Dynamics, a company that performs market research.

But the popularity of the Model 3 means something other than electric cars is becoming more appealing to consumers. It means automakers that have had success with petrol-powered models, like Volkswagen and Mercedes Benz, may be missing out on a huge opportunity to transition their offerings towards sustainability.

Europe’s biggest luxury carmakers waited long to begin developing cars that could compete with Tesla, and now the companies are lagging behind. The Model 3 already competes with best-selling petrol-powered premium sedans like the Mercedes C-Class or BMW 3 Series in price, despite being far more tech-focused.

Granted, European carmakers have started their own electric car programs. Both Volkswagen and Mercedes are beginning to build electric cars, but they only began developing EVs after Tesla proved that electric cars can be successful and popular among buyers. This leaves them several years behind Tesla, which holds a sizable lead over other carmakers in range, performance, and affordability.

Tesla’s vehicles are improving in performance and range through over-the-air software updates that allow owners to upgrade their cars through the internet, similar to a smartphone.

In addition to being years behind in terms of hardware and software, Volkswagen and Mercedes are making electric versions of cars that they have been building for years. This disqualifies the vehicles from being potential “game-changers,” according to JATO Dynamics analyst Felipe Munoz in a statement to The New York Times. Tesla’s vehicle designs, on the other hand, are fresh and unique, and Munoz believes this could be one of the reasons the company is doing so well.

The uniqueness Tesla is bringing to the table is precisely the way it will continue to disrupt the European auto market. Its cars offer a new and exciting way to travel, and Munoz says the way Tesla was going to beat traditional automakers was by being different than them. “It’s not only about the car itself. It’s also the way they are selling these cars,” Munoz states.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Tesla CEO Elon Musk clarified the confusion between Hardware 2.5 and Hardware 3 after a group of Chinese Tesla owners filed a lawsuit against the electric carmaker.

Confusion about Tesla’s Hardware 2.5 being included in the newest deliveries was confronted by some of the newest Model 3 owners in China. Some owners filed a lawsuit against Tesla accusing them of fraudulent behavior after the paperwork for their vehicles stated the company’s HW3 would be included.

The owners were surprised to see Hardware 2.5 was put into their vehicles, but without the purchase of the company’s Full Self Driving suite, the differences between HW2.5 and HW3 are non-existent.

A group known as the China Consumers’ Association will hear the owner’s initial complaints, but those who are filing with the association say they could demand triple compensation from Tesla if their concerns are not resolved, according to an article from the Nikkei Asian Review.

The problem with their complaint is that HW 2.5 and HW 3 have the same functionality if FSD is not involved. Tesla owner and enthusiast Sofiaan Fraval said, “The difference is FSD Preview mode which is only for FSD purchases. Software has the same functionality otherwise.”

Tesla apologized for the confusion it caused some owners and said they did not mean to mislead customers. The reason for putting the older HW 2.5 into vehicles was to expedite deliveries and get the vehicles to customers who had been waiting as soon as possible. The company also stated there was “almost no difference” in driving experience and safety for the Model 3.

Interestingly enough, Musk stated “Oddly, those who complained didn’t actually order FSD. Perhaps they weren’t aware that the computer is upgraded for free if the FSD option is ordered even after delivery.”

True. Oddly, those who complained didn’t actually order FSD. Perhaps they weren’t aware that the computer is upgraded for free if the FSD option is ordered even after delivery.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 4, 2020

Musk added that Tesla is currently planning to release more features of the FSD suite later this month.

Tesla owners have even reported that Hardware 3 retrofits are becoming a quick and painless process. Tesla owner-enthusiast Tesla Raj shared his experience of having his Model 3 retrofitted with HW3, and stated the process took all of seven hours to complete. Others have stated their vehicles have been upgraded in times as little as 2 hours and 20 minutes.

Owners who have vehicles with either HW2 or HW2.5 and have purchased the FSD suite for their cars can have the upgrade to HW3 free of charge. Even if the FSD suite is purchased after delivery, the hardware will still be upgraded free of charge, making the complaints from Chinese owners questionable.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});