LNG: TESLARATI

SpaceX just completed its fourth hosted Hyperloop competition since its 2017 debut and Hyperloop inventor and CEO Elon Musk capped the successful event with a big claim: in 2020, SpaceX plans to host Competition 5 at a brand-new vacuum tunnel that could offer all kinds of new opportunities to next year’s student teams.

According to Musk, that new track – presumably to be built by The Boring Company with SpaceX help – could be up to 10 km (6.2 mi) in length, will support a full vacuum like its 1.6 km (1 mi) predecessor, and will feature a curved track. Altogether, those features could support truly insane top speeds and allow teams to test pods with far more realistic acceleration profiles relative to those that have been tested at SpaceX’s track in the last few years. Furthermore, Musk specifically described the new track as a “10km vacuum tunnel”, immediately bringing to mind the obvious possibility of a new Boring Company collaboration.

As mentioned above, SpaceX just wrapped up its fourth Hyperloop competition in two years. Of the 21 teams that won slots in the event, only four were judged by SpaceX to be ready for speed runs. Of those four, the German team TUM Hyperloop (formerly WARR Hyperloop) reached a top speed of 288 mph (463 km/h, 128 m/s) before the pod suffered visible damage and performed a flawless emergency stop, pulling dozens of Gs and coming to a halt in just 50-100m.

In a nominal outcome, TUM Hyperloop anticipated that their fourth-generation pod could reach a top speed of more than half the speed of sound (~380+ mph, 600+ km/h). In 2018, they achieved a spectacular top speed of 290 mph, just slightly edging out Pod IV’s pre-anomaly performance this year. The runner-up, Swissloop, reached a still-impressive top speed of ~160 mph (260 km/h), a demonstrating of just how far ahead of its peers TUM/WARR remains.

At the end of the day, speed records are just icing on the Hyperloop Competition cake, following the main motivation of offering an almost unbeatable applied engineering learning opportunity for student groups around the world.

Hyperloop Alpha?

Assuming SpaceX and/or The Boring Company manage to pull off a minor engineering miracle and successfully build a “10km vacuum tunnel” in a single year, the company will have easily set itself up to host countless more competitions in the coming years. Additionally, assuming that “tunnel” refers to a full-scale tunnel capable of being built by The Boring Company, SpaceX’s new Hyperloop test facilities will be at or very near full-scale relative to the operational, human-rated transportation system that is the concept’s ultimate goal.

The test tunnel quite literally bored under the current above-ground Hyperloop track has a final usable diameter of 12 feet (3.7m), more than double the 6-foot (1.8m) diameter of the track currently used for competitions. Additionally, it would be even larger than Hyperloop One’s ~11 foot (3.3m) diameter Nevada test track. Ultimately, such a large tunnel would simultaneously give The Boring Company experience with building a true vacuum tunnel system and provide an opportunity for full-scale vacuum train (i.e. hyperloop) testing over unprecedented distances.

Maybe, just maybe, Elon Musk is thinking about putting a bit more time into turning his original Hyperloop concept into a finished product.

Check out Teslarati’s newsletters for prompt updates, on-the-ground perspectives, and unique glimpses of SpaceX’s rocket launch and recovery processes.

After multiple days of delays, many a finger is crossed that SpaceX will be able to perform a critical static fire test of Falcon 9 booster B1056.1 on Friday morning (July 19th).

Falcon 9 B1056 and a fresh upper stage are scheduled to launch Cargo Dragon mission CRS-18 no earlier than 7:35 pm EDT (23:35 UTC), July 21st. As always, SpaceX requires each Falcon 9 rocket to successfully perform a static fire ignition test prior to declaring launch readiness, and B1056 was originally planned to be loaded with propellant and fire its nine Merin 1D engines on Wednesday, July 16th.

After a solid handful of slips, the test has most recently been rescheduled on Friday morning, a delay of 48 hours. SpaceX has demonstrated a three-day turnaround between static fire and launch with Falcon 9 Block 5, but a static fire delay beyond Friday – perhaps even beyond early Friday afternoon – will almost certainly push CRS-18’s launch back a day or two. If not, SpaceX is certainly cutting it close to make the current July 21st date.

In support of Cargo Dragon Commercial Resupply Mission-17 (CRS-17), Falcon 9 B1056 launched for the first time on May 4th, roughly 11 weeks (76 days) ago and 78 days before its planned return to flight. For both SpaceX and NASA, CRS-18 will be a fairly significant launch for a variety of reasons

Falcon²

First and foremost, Falcon 9 B1056 previously supported a NASA Cargo Dragon mission, as described above. Even before the booster successfully landed and returned to port, plans were already in order to essentially keep the booster “in family”, reusing it for NASA launches only. Discussed on Teslarati immediately after the subject was broached during a post-launch press conference, NASA manager Kenny Todd didn’t split hairs.

“Quite frankly, [NASA] had a vested interest in this particular booster. We were gonna require it – the intent is to [reuse B1056 on SpaceX’s upcoming CRS-18 launch] and – potentially – CRS-19.” 

Kenny Todd, ISS Operations and Integration Manager, NASA Johnson

Not only will NASA fly Cargo Dragon’s CRS-18 mission on B1056, but the agency is already actively considering reusing the same Falcon 9 booster – assuming a successful launch and landing next week – on CRS-19, SpaceX’s second-to-last Dragon 1 (i.e. Cargo Dragon) launch. If all goes well with CRS-18, CRS-19 could come as early as December 2019, while CRS-20 – likely Dragon 1’s last launch ever – is scheduled no earlier than March 2020 and could certainly make use of B1056.3 if NASA is interested.

Dragon³

Meanwhile, although neither SpaceX or NASA have confirmed it, the Cargo Dragon capsule flight-proven Falcon 9 B1056 will itself be flight-proven – although that’s nothing shocking after a full half-dozen successful launches of reused capsules. What will be exceptional, however, is the likely event that CRS-18 will mark the first time that SpaceX has launched the same Cargo Dragon capsule on its third orbital mission.

Speaking all the way back in summer 2017, now two years distant, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk revealed that Cargo Dragon (Dragon 1) was designed at the outset to be reused three times. Almost exactly 24 months later, SpaceX is likely to prove that that is the case. Based on a list of known Dragon 1 capsules and their serial numbers, SpaceX has already launch and reused all but one of the last seven capsules built and successfully recovered. Capsule 107 (C107) supported CRS-5 in January 2015 and was successfully recovered one month later.

Aside from CRS-7 capsule C109, destroyed in June 2015 during Falcon 9’s first and only in-flight failure, all other capsules (C108-C113) have been successfully launched, recovered, and relaunched. As such, it seems extremely improbable that CRS-5 capsule C107 will be supporting CRS-18. Instead, one of SpaceX’s six twice-flight-proven orbital spacecraft has likely been refurbished for the final time, preparing to become the first orbital-class commercial spacecraft to be reused twice.

Thy Holy Stripe

Finally, it also appears that CRS-18 will mark the debut some sort of on-orbit Falcon upper stage test, hinted at by a grey ring wrapping what looks like just a portion of its fuel (RP-1/kerosene) tank. The objective of this modification is unclear, although chances are good that either NASASpaceflight.com or SpaceX itself will provide at least a bit more information in the coming days.

Check out Teslarati’s newsletters for prompt updates, on-the-ground perspectives, and unique glimpses of SpaceX’s rocket launch and recovery processes.

BMW’s electric car initiative is at a crossroads. After mostly being shelved by outgoing CEO Harald Krüger during his years leading the company, BMW’s EV program has the potential to see a revival with the naming of its new chief executive. Fortunately, recent reports indicate that BMW is set to name the rather understated Oliver Zipse over Klaus Fröhlich as the carmaker’s new CEO. 

BMW’s supervisory board is expected to discuss the company’s new leadership at the Spartanburg, South Carolina plant on Thursday. So far, reports indicate that the 55-year-old Zipse is the favored candidate over the 59-year old Fröhlich, who serves as BMW’s Head of Development. Fröhlich had attracted a number of headlines as of late, particularly when he insisted that there was no demand for electric vehicles. 

Zipse joined BMW as a trainee back in 1991, rising through the company’s ranks and holding several posts. Prior to becoming a board member for production, Zipse worked as the carmaker’s Head of Brand and Product Strategies. Over his years with the company, Zipse has shown proficiency in manufacturing efficiencies. BMW’s efficient production network, which was expanded in Hungary, China, and the United States, emerged under Zipse’s lead, and it has helped the carmaker deliver healthy profit margins. 

Auto analysts and industry experts believe that it will take more than manufacturing expertise to lead BMW into the EV era. In a statement to Reuters, Carsten Breitfeld, a former BMW engineer who currently serves as the chief executive of China-based ICONIQ motors, noted that Zipse’s apparent appointment “goes far beyond optimizing an existing business.” “He needs to be able to build teams, to attract key talent, and to promote a culture which is increasingly oriented along consumer electronics and internet dynamics,” the former BMW engineer said. 

One key aspect that Zipse would have to work on is BMW’s electric car program, which has lagged against rivals like Mercedes-Benz and Audi, both of which have already released, or a least unveiled, their own premium all-electric vehicles. BMW actually had an early lead with the i3, but the vehicle was practically abandoned by the company when it failed to get traction. 

Silicon Valley-based Tesla, a newcomer on the market, has so far established a substantial lead in the EV space, and its Model 3 sedan has started eating into the sales of popular gas-powered four-doors like the BMW 3-Series. UBS analyst Patrick Hummel addressed this, stating that “Tesla has a lead of three to four years in areas like software and electronics. The millennials are much more focused on these things. There is a risk that the Germans can’t catch up.”  

BMW had already made a mistake in electric vehicles once. During the time of the i3, it was reported that CEO Harald Krüger’s reluctance to push low-margin EVs ultimately led to an exodus of talented engineers. Among these are Christian Senger, who is now a board member responsible for software for Volkswagen, and Markus Duesmann, who is reportedly in line to be Audi’s CEO in the future. If BMW does decide on Zipse, it could have another chance at breaking through the emerging EV market, albeit late.

Now, if BMW elects the electric car-dismissing Klaus Fröhlich as its next CEO instead, the German carmaker could be looking into even more turbulent years ahead.

Tesla has opened one of its largest Supercharger V3 sites to date. Situated at the heart of the Las Vegas strip next to the High Roller at The LINQ, the expansive charging location is designed to accommodate over a thousand electric cars daily. 

The Las Vegas Supercharger V3 station features the full Tesla Energy ecosystem, with solar panels collecting energy during the day, and Powerpack batteries powering the site at night. The location has 24 charging stalls, as well as 15 additional level-two Tesla Wall Connectors for owners who are parking their vehicles for longer amounts of time. With a total of 39 chargers, the Las Vegas station will likely play a notable role in supporting the growing number of Tesla owners residing in and visiting the Las Vegas, NV area. 

Las Vegas has already been hosting over 6,500 Supercharging sessions per month, but with the new site being online, the city could accommodate an additional 1,500 vehicles per day. The initiative supports Caesar’s goal of reducing its carbon emissions by 30% by 2025, while also making Las Vegas an overall friendlier destination for electric vehicle owners. 

What really makes Tesla’s Supercharger V3 special is the speed offered by the new charging infrastructure. With a maximum power output of 250 kW or 1,000 miles per hour, V3 stations are able to replenish up to 180 miles worth of range in 15 minutes. Tesla owners using V3 chargers are also not required to split power with neighboring vehicles, which ensures that every electric car in the location gets a consistent level of power.  

So far, compatibility with Supercharger V3’s 250 kW peak rates is exclusive to the Model 3, though Tesla has rolled out improvements for the charging capabilities of the Model S and Model X as well. Among these are On-Route Battery Warmup, which allows vehicles to intelligently heat the battery to ensure optimal temperatures for charging, and unlocking peak charge rates of up to 150 kW for the Supercharger V2 Network. 

Interestingly, Tesla’s announcement for the Las Vegas Supercharger V3 station featured a Model X charging in the location. Considering that Tesla is yet to announce a peak charge rate of 250 kW for the flagship Model S and Model X, the use of the vehicle for the V3 video is quite interesting. Perhaps V3 compatibility is just around the corner? One can certainly hope.

It appears that Audi is putting the pedal to the metal with its efforts at promoting its first all-electric SUV, the e-tron. One of these initiatives, which has been shared online, is notably bold, with the German carmaker bringing the e-tron over to Supercharger stations in what appears to be an attempt at persuading Tesla owners to shift to the 204-mile, five-seater SUV. 

Reports from the electric car community in Germany have noted that Audi has been placing promotional merchandise at Tesla Club tables during exhibitions. Demo units of the e-tron are also being parked at select Supercharger stations. One promotional Audi e-tron unit was even photographed blocking a Supercharger stall, similar to how anti-EV drivers “ICE” an electric car charging station. 

While forms of guerilla marketing are common, Audi’s strategy this time around is questionable at best. EV charging ethics aside, it would be unwise for Audi to promote the e-tron at Superchargers because the vehicle has subpar range compared to any of Tesla’s current offerings. With a 204-mile EPA rating, the e-tron has less range than a Model 3 Standard Plus, or even a 2012 Model S. Thus, by placing the e-tron at Superchargers, Audi could risk highlighting the e-tron’s range disadvantage to potential customers. 

Apart from this, Audi does not have its own charging infrastructure. The e-tron is capable of rapid charging, but the vehicle relies on third-party solutions for long-distance travel. Tesla’s Supercharger Network, on the other hand, has expanded to such a degree that long trips are practically effortless. Audi’s marketing team then has a very challenging task: persuading Tesla owners to abandon the Supercharger Network for something inferior. 

Apart from occupying Tesla Superchargers, reports from the electric car community in Germany have also noted that Audi has been calling Tesla owners and former Audi drivers to offer them an extended test drive with the e-tron for two days including 1,000 km (620 miles). What is rather interesting is that customers who accept Audi’s offer are reportedly asked if they would be willing to give comments about their experience in the all-electric vehicle. Audi is reportedly also asking if they could send over a photographer to document the test drive as well. 

In a way, it is unfortunate to see Audi adopt such tactics to promote the e-tron to potential customers. Being an all-electric car, after all, Audi’s goal with the SUV must be to reduce the number of gas and diesel-powered vehicles on the road. The company would not be able to do this if it just focuses its efforts at Tesla drivers, who are already driving all-electric cars. That simply misses the whole point of the EV transition.

And that’s a shame. Apart from its subpar range and unexciting acceleration (or as Consumer Reports calls it, a “more elegant pull-away”), the e-tron is not a bad electric vehicle by any means. It’s vault-like quiet inside, and it has a luxurious interior that would likely be enough to encourage die-hard traditional car fans to consider shifting to electric. There’s a portion of the car buying public that will never consider Tesla due to a myriad of reasons, and that’s exactly the demographic where the e-tron could dominate. Unfortunately, Audi doesn’t seem to have its sights set on the right target just yet.